Who is the Richest Supreme Court Judge? Full Asset Details Now Public After Judicial Transparency Controversy

The Supreme Court of India confirmed that the remaining 12 judges will have their asset declarations published as submitted, strengthening transparency after recent controversies. Currently, 21 of 33 judges have published their assets. Additionally, the entire judicial appointment process is now public, promoting accountability and public trust in the judiciary.

Mediation, Not Litigation: President Murmu & CJI Khanna Champion Justice Reform at National Conference

President Murmu and CJI Khanna advocated for mediation as a superior approach to justice during the National Mediation Conference, highlighting its ability to ease court congestion and foster social harmony. They stressed mediation’s role in restoring relationships and its significance in the Indian legal system, encouraging broader awareness and implementation.

Sharjeel Imam’s Plea: Supreme Court Hints at Staying FIRs in Multiple States for One Speech

Sharjeel Imam has petitioned the Supreme Court to consolidate multiple FIRs related to his speeches at Jamia Millia Islamia and Aligarh Muslim University, arguing for a single trial to avoid multiple prosecutions. The Court noted the commonality of the speech but recognized distinct incidents linked to it in different states. The case will be revisited in two weeks.

CJI Sanjiv Khanna Makes History: Skips Supreme Court Work for a Week for SCO Conference in China

For the first time ever, a sitting Chief Justice of India paused court work to attend an international conference. CJI Sanjiv Khanna will return to a packed schedule Today (April 28) before his retirement on May 13.

[BREAKING] Indian Ambassador Rawat Welcomes CJI Khanna in Shanghai to Strengthen Judicial Ties

India’s Ambassador to China, Pradeep Kumar Rawat, warmly welcomed Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna at India House in Shanghai, emphasizing the importance of judicial collaboration for strengthening India-China relations. The visit aims to promote high-level exchanges and cooperation on judicial reforms and cultural understanding, highlighting diplomatic engagement beyond trade.

SCBA Seeks AG’s Nod to Initiate Contempt Proceedings Against Nishikant Dubey Over Remarks on CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court Bar Association condemned BJP MP Nishikant Dubey’s remarks about the judiciary and Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, labeling them defamatory and amounting to criminal contempt. The SCBA urged the Attorney General to initiate contempt proceedings against Dubey, emphasizing the need to uphold the dignity of the Supreme Court.

‘Dignity & Decorum Supreme Court Must Always Maintained’: Legal Experts Slam VP Dhankhar and BJP MP Dubey for Remarks Against Supreme Court

Last week, Vice President Dhankhar criticized the judiciary for setting deadlines on presidential decisions, suggesting it acted like a “super Parliament.” Legal experts condemned his remarks as irresponsible. BJP MP Dubey also disparaged the Supreme Court, prompting the BJP leadership to clarify their respect for the judiciary amidst concerns over recent riots related to a controversial law.

Kapil Sibal Slams Waqf Law 2025 In Supreme Court: “State Officer Acting as Judge in Own Cause Is Unconstitutional”

Today, On 16th April, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, arguing before the Supreme Court, strongly opposed the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. He said allowing a state-appointed Collector to decide if a property is waqf makes the officer a “judge in his own cause”, which is unconstitutional.

Waqf Row | “When We Sit Here, We Lose Our Religion”: CJI Khanna Hits Back When SG Mehta Says “Your Lordships Cannot Hear This Case”

Today, On 16th April, During the Waqf Amendment Act hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s remark” Then this bench also cannot hear the case” created a sharp response from the Supreme Court, which questioned the inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf bodies and pressed the Centre for clarity.

Supreme Court Slams UP Police: “Filing a Criminal Case for Civil Wrongs Is Unacceptable”, Imposes Rs. 50,000 Fine

The Supreme Court of India reprimanded the Uttar Pradesh Police for filing a criminal case in a civil property dispute, imposing a Rs. 50,000 fine on involved officers. The court emphasized that civil matters should remain non-criminal and criticized the misuse of criminal law. The case involved Rikhab and Sadhna Birani amid prior magistrate rejections.