CJI B.R. Gavai said, “Petitioner may seek remedy before HC under Article 226,” while refusing to entertain a plea on attempts to destroy the minority character of Sam Higginbottom University. The Court added, “Petition under Art. 32 not maintainable here.”
Today, On 26th July, CJI Gavai confirmed he won’t accept any government position after his retirement on November 24. He stated he will instead take up consultation and arbitration, while speaking at the inauguration of the Late T R Gilda Memorial E-Library at the Amravati District and Sessions Court.
CJI B.R. Gavai emphasized the significance of the Indian Constitution in safeguarding citizens’ rights, particularly against illegal demolitions termed “bulldozer justice.” The Supreme Court mandated due process before any demolition, highlighting the fundamental right to shelter under Article 21. It protects citizens from arbitrary actions by authorities while ensuring justice and dignity.
CJI B.R. Gavai, speaking at a London summit, proposed four urgent reforms for India’s arbitration: ensuring finality of awards, promoting institutional arbitration, enforcing stricter timelines to prevent delays, and increasing diversity among arbitrators. His vision aims to enhance India’s arbitration landscape, making it more efficient, reliable, and inclusive.
The Supreme Court Collegium, led by CJI B.R. Gavai, has recommended the transfer or repatriation of 21 High Court judges across India. Significant changes affect courts in Telangana, Delhi, and Bombay. These moves aim to enhance judicial efficiency, reduce backlogs, and ensure balanced distribution of judicial responsibilities among the High Courts.