Jana Nayagan Row| References To Foreign Powers Creating Conflict: Madras High Court

Madras High Court said Vijay’s film Jana Nayagan allegedly contains references to foreign forces provoking internal conflict, potentially disturbing communal harmony, requiring verification. Setting aside a single judge order, the court halted CBFC’s direction to grant certification, delaying release.

Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL Against Release of “The Taj Story”, Says Court Can’t Act as ‘Super Censor Board’

The Delhi High Court refused to stop the release of “The Taj Story”, criticizing the poorly prepared PIL and noting that artistic expression cannot be curtailed. The Bench said the petitioner may approach the Centre under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act.

“Is There a Law Against Films on Constitutional Authorities?” — Bombay High Court Questions CBFC Over Yogi Adityanath Biopic

Bombay High Court slammed CBFC for refusing to certify the film Ajey without even watching it. The Court said rejection must follow proper legal process, not assumptions.

“Judiciary Must Stay Away from This Nonsense”: Supreme Court Weighs Rights, Refuses to Rush Judgment on ‘Udaipur Files’

Supreme Court hears plea on ‘Udaipur Files’ film release, weighing free speech against accused’s fair trial rights. Justices question CBFC cuts, Centre’s role, and prejudice to ongoing trial.

“Udaipur Files Release Stayed”: Delhi HC Acts to Protect Fair Trial and Communal Harmony

The Delhi High Court has stayed the release of “Udaipur Files” until the Centre decides on a plea challenging its CBFC certification. The film, based on the 2022 Udaipur murder, is alleged to threaten communal peace.

BREAKING | India’s Got Latent: Supreme Court Issues Notice on YouTuber Ashish Chanchlani’s Plea Against FIRs

Today, On 21st February, The Supreme Court issued notices to Assam and Maharashtra on YouTuber Ashish Chanchlani’s request to club multiple FIRs. His case was tagged with Ranveer Allahbadia’s similar plea, the main accused in the matter. The move aims to streamline proceedings and avoid multiple trials.

India’s Got Latent Obscenity Row || Ashish Chanchlani Moves SC To Quash FIR In Guwahati: “Quash the FIR as It Was Registered Later”

YouTuber Ashish Chanchlani approached the Supreme Court to quash or transfer an FIR filed against him in Guwahati. The case pertains to alleged obscenity on the show India’s Got Latent. Chanchlani seeks relief from legal action, arguing against the charges. The Supreme Court’s decision on his plea is now awaited.

‘Documentaries Don’t Fall Under Cinematograph Act’: SC to Hear Plea on Pre-Censorship of Films in January

Yesterday, On 19th November, The Supreme Court will hear a plea about pre-censorship of films in January, initiated by actor-director Amol Palekar. The case challenges the Cinematograph Act’s regulations, arguing they are outdated. During previous hearings, concerns regarding government regulations and artistic freedom were raised, with the landscape of film censorship in India evolving continually.

[IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack] PIL to Ban Netflix Series Withdrawn After Disclaimer Update

A petition to ban Netflix’s “IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack” series was withdrawn from the Delhi High Court after Netflix added a disclaimer. The petitioner raised concerns about the portrayal of the hijackers and sought a ban, claiming it misrepresented historical events and offended Hindu sentiments. Netflix has committed to updating the disclaimer with the real names of the hijackers.

‘Emergency’ Movie Row| “Board Shall Consider Representation Before Certifying the Film”: Madhya Pradesh HC Directs CBFC

Today, On 3rd September, the Madhya Pradesh High Court declined to halt the release of Kangana Ranaut’s movie “Emergency,” scheduled for this Friday, but directed the CBFC to consider objections before granting a censor certificate. The PIL filed by Sikh groups raised concerns about the movie. The Court dismissed the petition but instructed the CBFC to address the objections.