Chief Justice DY Chandrachud acknowledged the extensive delays in court proceedings, impacting litigants. He shared experiences from the Allahabad High Court, questioning the practice of halting court work for a bar member’s death. He highlighted the need to reconsider the societal impact of such practices. Justice Chandrachud’s speech also expressed admiration for Kolkata, Bengali cinema, and literature.
Today, On 13th June, The Kerala High Court set new guidelines for judges’ chambers and the signing/uploading of judgments post-retirement to ensure timely delivery of judgments and proper use of court resources. This comes after allegations against a retired judge who continued visiting her chambers and accessing case files. The guidelines require judges to submit pending judgments and restrict the use of chambers after retirement.
Today, On 13th June, The Gujarat High Court strongly criticized the state government for the Rajkot TRP Game Zone fire, emphasizing the need for accountability and preventive measures. It warned of consequences for responsible officials and demanded timely action and reports. The tragic event, resulting in multiple fatalities, raised concerns about safety measures and government negligence.
Chief Justice Ravi Malimath of Madhya Pradesh High Court retired, proudly stating that his enemies are a testament to his commitment to justice. His bold decisions and judicial integrity mark a distinguished tenure. Malimath emphasized his commitment to upholding the Constitution and highlighted his significant case dispositions. Despite challenges, he leaves a legacy of judicial bravery.
The Kerala High Court warned registry officials of disciplinary action if cases are not listed according to the prescribed roster, stressing the importance of orderly case management. Improper listing could cause inconvenience to judges and advocates. The court agreed with appellants that cases should be listed and heard strictly in accordance with the roster.
Today(on 17th May), The Calcutta High Court directed BJP Mandal President Gangadhar Kayl’s plea to the Chief Justice, citing the ongoing Sandeshkhali case being heard by another Bench. Justice Jay Sengupta led the proceedings, acknowledging Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya’s involvement in the main case.
Today, 14th May, The Calcutta High Court addressed concerns of police overaction raised by ex-judge Abhijit Gangopadhyay, highlighting potential issues with law enforcement’s actions. Gangopadhyay, a BJP candidate, sought to quash an FIR filed against him, alleging political motivation. The case was removed from the list and referred to the Chief Justice for reassignment.
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed a contempt case against the Advocate General and Additional Advocate General due to procedural irregularities. The case arose from alleged misconduct during a virtual hearing. The court stressed the importance of upholding decorum in legal proceedings and highlighted the need for adherence to procedural guidelines. The dismissal drew attention to maintaining the rule of law in court.
Today(on 8th May), The Bombay High Court rejected a PIL seeking FIR against celebrities endorsing tobacco and gutka ads, citing lack of legal merit and suitable pleadings. The petitioner sought withdrawal after the court’s remarks, and it was granted. The Court advised the NGO to approach PILs with more seriousness and thorough research in the future.