A PIL has challenged CM Vishnu Deo Sai’s move to expand the Chhattisgarh cabinet to 14 ministers, exceeding the constitutional limit of 13. The High Court will hear the state’s reply on September 2.
The Chhattisgarh High Court ruled that insulting a husband for being unemployed and making unfair demands during financial crisis amounts to mental cruelty. The Court granted divorce in favour of the husband after the wife failed to contest the case.
The Chhattisgarh High Court directed the State government to give Rs 25,000 each to students of a middle school where dog-licked food was served as midday meal. The Court strongly criticized the negligence and ordered strict action.
Chhattisgarh HC takes suo motu cognizance after a sting exposes open knife sales in Bilaspur, linking them to 120 stabbings in 7 months, sparking an urgent crackdown.
The Central Government has notified the appointment and extension of 16 judges in five High Courts, following Supreme Court Collegium recommendations. The move includes new permanent Judges and tenure extensions to strengthen the judiciary.
The Chhattisgarh High Court ruled that saying “I love you” without sexual intent doesn’t attract POCSO charges, upholding the youth’s acquittal due to lack of evidence.
The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended the appointment of nine additional judges as permanent judges in the High Courts of Andhra Pradesh, Calcutta, Chhattisgarh, and Karnataka, stating they are “fit for being appointed permanently.”
Supreme Court upheld a man’s conviction for sexually assaulting a minor but reduced his sentence from natural life to standard life imprisonment. Court ruled enhanced punishment under amended POCSO can’t apply retrospectively.
Luxury cars blocked a national highway in Chhattisgarh for Instagram reels. The Chhattisgarh High Court slammed police inaction, questioning why strict laws weren’t applied and vehicles not seized immediately.
Today, 18th July, The Supreme Court ordered transfer of all four PILs seeking a ban on opinion trading platforms from Bombay, Gujarat, and Chhattisgarh High Courts, stating, “All four PILs must be heard here” for uniform adjudication.
