Today, On 17th November, The Supreme Court dismissed a plea challenging the bar on civilian prayers inside a Chennai military mosque, stressing that security concerns must take priority. The Court said “security cannot be compromised” while upholding the restriction within the cantonment area.
Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad of the Madras High Court passed away at 56 on May 6 due to cardiac arrest following health issues at home. Known for his legal acumen, he significantly reduced backlog cases. His sudden death is a profound loss for Tamil Nadu’s legal community, as noted by the Madras Bar Association.
The Supreme Court has referred Prasanna Sankar and Dhivya Sashidhar’s high-profile marital dispute for mediation. The case gained attention after Sankar’s viral tweets alleging harassment and custody conflict. New Delhi: On Friday, the Supreme Court of India sent the matrimonial dispute between Prasanna Sankar, co-founder of tech company Rippling, and his wife Dhivya Sashidhar for […]
The Madras High Court expressed confidence that divine blessings will support the development of a metro station, even if temple land is acquired. The judge stated that the metro project would benefit lakhs of people and hoped that God would show kindness toward this public cause. The court emphasized that such infrastructure projects aim to serve the greater good. The statement came amid debates over using religious land for public development.
Madras: In an unexpected move, two judges of the Madras High Court made a surprise visit to Puzhal Central Prison, located on the outskirts of Chennai, on Wednesday. Justices MS Ramesh and N Senthil Kumar spent nearly three hours inside the prison, carefully inspecting the facilities, speaking to inmates, and assessing the overall living conditions.
Today, On 13th February, The Delhi High Court issued stay Adyar Gate from using the ‘Dakshin’ name after ITC filed a lawsuit. ITC claimed exclusive rights over the mark and objected to Adyar Gate’s new restaurant in Chennai’s Alwarpet. The court’s order prevents the restaurant from operating under the disputed name. This ruling highlights the importance of trademark protection in business disputes.