The Allahabad High Court ordered that proceedings under the SC\ST Act can be quashed using Section 482 of the CrPC if they involve an abuse of the legal process. The court emphasized that such powers should be exercised cautiously. This decision highlights the balance between safeguarding rights and preventing misuse of legal provisions. It reinforces the judiciary’s role in upholding fairness and justice.
Senior Advocate Sanjoy Ghose has accused Congress leader Rahul Gandhi of abusing political power to benefit billionaire George Soros. Allegations include manipulating government policies and tenders, coercing media and businesses, undermining bureaucratic processes, and facilitating contracts with foreign governments. Ghose’s statements raise significant concerns about corruption and accountability in Indian politics.
![[Excise 'Scam'] Delhi HC Issues Notice Over Manish Sisodia’s Plea Challenging ED's Charge Sheet Over Lack Of Sanction](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-6-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court, on Monday (2nd Dec) led by Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri, will hear former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia’s plea against the ED’s charges on December 20. Sisodia argues that the charges lack prior sanction under CrPC due to his public servant status, echoing the Supreme Court’s ruling that requires such approval for prosecution.
![[Swati Maliwal Assault Case] "Fails to Exercise Judicial Discretion, Issues Mechanical Order": Bibhav Kumar Challenges Delhi Court's Cognizance of Chargesheet](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-23-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Bibhav Kumar, charged with assaulting Swati Maliwal, has contested the court’s cognizance of the chargesheet, claiming procedural errors under the Bharat Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. His revision petition is pending at Tis Hazari Court, with arguments citing adherence to old procedures instead of the new law. The case continues to be judicially reviewed.
![[R.G. Kar Rape & Murder] 'Leaves Home in CBI Vehicle': Victim's Parents Testify as Trial Begins in Sealdah Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/img-4.png?resize=447%2C270&ssl=1)
Today, On 11th November, The trial for the rape and murder of a young girl commenced at Sealdah Court on November 11. The victim’s parents are the first witnesses, with a total of 128 expected to testify. The case, involving a civic volunteer as the sole accused, has drawn significant controversy, with claims of innocence from the defendant.
The Supreme Court on Monday(11th Nov) dismissed former MP Prajwal Revanna’s bail plea in a rape case. Despite arguments from his lawyer regarding the specificity of allegations, the Court refused bail after a brief hearing. Revanna has been accused of multiple sexual assaults, leading to a significant public outcry and ongoing investigations.
![[Coaching Center Death] Delhi Court Reserves Order RAU's Study Circle Case, Next Hearing on November 14](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-12-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 29th October, Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court reserved its decision in the CBI case against CEO Abhishek Gupta and five others, scheduling the next hearing for November 14. Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court transferred the investigation into the deaths of three UPSC aspirants to the CBI, criticizing inadequate police investigations.
The investigation into the young doctor’s murder suggests premeditation, as modified duty rosters were noticed prior to the incident. Key suspects Sandeep Ghosh and Sanjoy Roy have been linked through evidence, including exchanged photos and video calls. Forensic findings further implicate Roy, who has been arrested as the prime suspect.
Today, On 3rd October, AAP leader Satyendar Jain requested default bail from the Delhi High Court, arguing that the investigation into his money laundering case is incomplete. His legal team claims the trial court acted on insufficient evidence, challenging the validity of the charges. The hearing is scheduled for October 9.
![[1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Case] "Perverse, Illegal & Lacked Application of Mind": Jagdish Tytler Challenges Charges Against Him in Delhi HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Delhi-Court-orders-CBI-to-frame-charges-against-Congress-leader-Jagdish-Tytler-in-1984-anti-Sikh-genocide.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 30th September, Jagdish Tytler, a former Congress leader, challenged murder charges related to the 1984 anti-Sikh riots in the Delhi High Court. He claims the trial court’s decision is flawed and insists there is no credible evidence against him, describing the case as a “witch-hunt” after 40 years.