![[BREAKING] Manish Sisodia Bail Plea, Denies Bail in Both CBI and ED Cases](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/image-40-4.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, 26th April, The Delhi Court extended the judicial custody of AAP leader Manish Sisodia and others in connection to the Excise Policy Case until May 8. The case involves allegations of irregularities in the Delhi government’s liquor policy. The court also issued directives to the Enforcement Directorate to estimate the time required for digitizing the documents, aiming for more efficient handling of the case.
Today, 24th April,Umar Khalid’s lawyer argued in court that the allegations against him do not amount to a terrorism offense, emphasizing the lack of evidence. The defense also highlighted media scrutiny and called for a fair legal process. Khalid’s bail request is under consideration, with the next hearing scheduled for May 7. The lawyer cited inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case and urged the court to assess the evidence critically.
Today(on 20th April), Amanat Ullah Khan, an AAP MLA, was summoned to court via video conference by the ED for ignoring multiple summons related to alleged money laundering activities connected to the Delhi Waqf Board. The case, scheduled for April 27, involves accusations of illegal property purchase and unauthorized appointments, drawing significant legal scrutiny and public attention.
The Supreme Court has directed States and Union Territories to retain their panel lawyers for at least six weeks after a change in government to prevent unnecessary adjournments in court proceedings. The directive aims to ensure the smooth functioning of courts and avoid inconvenience to litigants. This order followed a hearing of a bail plea by an individual accused of cheating in an examination conducted by the Uttarakhand government.
On 27th March: The Delhi court has granted an early hearing for Manish Sisodia’s bail plea in the Delhi Excise Policy case, setting it for April 2, 2024, instead of the previously scheduled April 4. The bail plea is contested due to potential flight risk and tampering with evidence concerns, with the trial’s delay also factoring in.