CLAT PG candidates have approached the Kerala High Court against the counselling fee, saying it “fails to consider socio-economic disparities” and ends up excluding deserving students from poor backgrounds, violating the principle of equal opportunity.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Punjab’s plea to modify its May 6 order on releasing water to Haryana from Bhakra Dams. The court stated Punjab could still refer the matter to the central government. Punjab’s arguments regarding procedural shortcomings and material facts were rejected, affirming compliance with prior decisions.
The proposed delimitation post-2026 will significantly impact Lok Sabha and Assembly seat distributions, potentially altering political power among states. Concerns arise, particularly from southern states, about reduced representation despite their economic contributions. Instead of increasing the number of legislators, enhancing local governance and efficiency should be prioritized to better address citizens’ needs.
The Centre informed the Supreme Court that Muslims will continue to hold an “overwhelming majority” in waqf bodies under the amended Waqf Act. The government defended the inclusion of non-Muslims, emphasizing its aim to uphold secular functions. The Centre asserted the constitutional lawfulness of the amendments and highlighted concerns about previous waqf law abuses.
The Supreme Court of India will hear ten petitions, including one by MP Asaduddin Owaisi, challenging the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2025 on April 16. This Act introduces significant changes to the management of waqf properties, increasing Central Government authority and altering the criteria for declaring waqf, raising concerns among communities.
Union ministers Kiren Rijiju and Nirmala Sitharaman welcomed a Kerala Bishop’s support for amending the Waqf Act, calling certain provisions “unjust.” Rijiju stated that the act is not against any community and accused critics of spreading propaganda to mislead people. The debate over the amendments has sparked political and religious discussions. The issue highlights broader concerns about property rights and religious governance in India.
Today, On 28th March, The Delhi High Court once again Set-aside the government’s decision to cancel the OCI card of Professor Ashok Swain. This marks the second time the court has quashed the revocation order. The ruling reinforces Swain’s right to retain his Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) status. The case highlights ongoing legal battles over citizenship rights and government decisions.