ED registers money laundering case against 29 stars for endorsing gambling apps like A23, Lotus365. Promotions misled public, FIRs filed across 5 cities.
The Supreme Court of India recently upheld the consumer’s right to health and quality product information in advertising. Justices directed advertisers to submit a self-declaration form confirming compliance with the Advertising Code before advertising. The court emphasized the importance of protecting consumers and urged the relevant ministries to establish a consumer complaint system.
Today(on 8th May), The Bombay High Court rejected a PIL seeking FIR against celebrities endorsing tobacco and gutka ads, citing lack of legal merit and suitable pleadings. The petitioner sought withdrawal after the court’s remarks, and it was granted. The Court advised the NGO to approach PILs with more seriousness and thorough research in the future.
![[Patanjali Fake Ad Case] Celebrities, Influencers Equally Liable for Misleading Ads: SC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-9.png?resize=447%2C361&ssl=1)
Today(7th May): The Supreme Court ruled that celebrities and influencers are equally responsible for endorsing misleading advertisements. They emphasized the need for transparency in paid endorsements and stated that endorsers, advertisers, and advertising agencies share equal responsibility. The Court issued directions to promote accountability, including the submission of self-declaration forms by advertisers and TV broadcasters.
