Misuse of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) took center stage in a contentious ruling by the Supreme Court of India in X v. Telangana State and Another (2024 INSC 953), delivered at the year’s end. The judgment sparked debate with its observations, suggesting that some wives exploit this provision as a tool for personal vendetta against their husbands and their families.
Justice Nagarathna believes that the judiciary becomes truly representative when more women are on the bench. She elaborates that this inclusivity aligns with the principles of justice and the Constitution, ensuring diverse perspectives in adjudication. Justice BV Nagarathna, soon to make history as the first woman Chief Justice of India (CJI), shared her thoughts on her journey, her father’s inspiring legacy, and the evolving judicial system in India.
The Central government Today (July 31st) opposed states’ plea in the Supreme Court for a refund of royalty levied on mines since 1989, arguing it would burden public units by over Rs 70,000 crore. The Supreme Court’s recent ruling stated royalty is not a tax, and states sought retrospective application, which the Centre opposed.
Justice Sanjeev Khanna today recused himself from hearing a review petition on same-sex marriage, leading to the reconstitution of a five-judge constitutional bench by CJI DY Chandrachud. The Supreme Court deferred the hearing, and it was clarified that review petitions are decided in chambers, with no open court hearing. The original judgment denied marriage rights to queer couples.
The Supreme Court will review 13 petitions challenging the 2023 verdict on same-sex marriage in India. A specially constituted five-judge bench, including Chief Justice Chandrachud, will consider the petitions. The review aims for a more inclusive interpretation of marriage laws to encompass same-sex couples. Justices Khanna and Nagarathna have replaced retired Justices Kaul and Bhat.
The Supreme Court Today reserved judgment on whether mineral royalties are considered a tax under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act of 1957. The nine-judge bench, led by CJI DY Chandrachud, engaged in extensive deliberations over eight days, addressing appeals from state governments, mining entities, and public sector undertakings. This decision is highly anticipated for its potential impact on India’s regulatory landscape.
![[BREAKING] Same Sex Marriage | Justice Sanjeev Khanna Recused Himself from the Hearing Citing Personal Reasons](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-33-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
