The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the word “may” in an arbitration clause does not make arbitration optional. Justice Deepak Khot ruled that parties’ intention must be examined from the agreement as a whole, allowing appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6).
The Bombay High Court upheld restrictions on The New Indian Express using the brand name beyond agreed territorial limits under a family settlement. The Court dismissed EPM’s appeal and reaffirmed The Indian Express’s trademark and brand rights.
The Bombay High Court allowed Raj Kundra to challenge a UK anti-suit injunction over his Rajasthan Royals stake, with Justice Abhay Ahuja granting Clause XII leave for suit.
The Supreme Court of India restored contempt proceedings in the HERO trademark dispute between Hero Cycles Limited and Hero Ecotech Limited, setting aside the Patna High Court order that quashed action under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC.
The Supreme Court ruled that a proprietorship is only a trade name and not a juristic person with separate legal status, holding that while such a concern can be sued, it cannot itself initiate legal proceedings.
Vaibhav Pandya, stepbrother of cricketers Hardik and Krunal Pandya, is embroiled in a legal dispute over allegedly embezzling Rs 4 crore from a shared business. He claims it’s a family matter and a misunderstanding. The prosecution seeks an extension for investigation, emphasizing the necessity to uncover crucial financial details.
