Supreme Court issues notice on contempt plea over alleged biased demolitions in Assam’s Hasila Beel. Petitioners say eviction drive violated SC bulldozer guidelines and hit minority families.
Today, On 13th November, the Supreme Court criticized the practice of “bulldozer justice,” highlighting the negative impact on vulnerable families, particularly women and children. The Court established guidelines mandating due process before demolitions, stressing that homes symbolize significant socio-economic aspirations and cannot be eliminated based solely on accusations.
Today, 22nd October, the Supreme Court temporarily halted bulldozer actions linked to the Bahraich violence case, agreeing to review challenges against demolition notices. The Uttar Pradesh government assured no action will be taken until the next hearing. Concerns about sensitive demolition practices prompted this temporary stay for further examination.
![[Bahraich Violence] "Is State Misunderstood Intent of Previous Order on Demolition Notices?": Allahabad HC Slams UP Govt. For not Filing Response](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-2-6.png?resize=447%2C251&ssl=1)
A special bench of the High Court temporarily stayed the demolition of allegedly illegal structures in Bahraich, providing the accused 15 days to respond to the notices. The court emphasized the need for clarity in construction authorizations and directed state authorities to consider responses carefully before making decisions. The next hearing is set for October 23.
![[Bulldozer Action] "Demolitions Carried Out in Strict Provision of Law": SC Praises UP Govt’s Legal Adherence](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-2024-09-04T151817.783.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court praised the Uttar Pradesh Government’s adherence to legal procedures in its ‘bulldozer action’ to demolish properties of individuals accused of crimes. However, the Court also proposed nationwide guidelines to regulate such demolitions and raised concerns about ethical and legal implications, emphasizing the need to ensure adherence to established legal standards.
