Turkish firm Celebi has challenged the Indian government’s cancellation of its security clearance in the Delhi High Court, citing national security concerns linked to Turkey’s support for Pakistan. The company argues the decision was sudden and unjustified, significantly impacting its operations in India’s aviation sector amid rising political tensions.
Mahua Moitra has filed a complaint in Delhi High Court against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey and advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai for allegedly defamatory social media posts. The Court questioned the credibility of Dubey’s claims about Moitra’s foreign accounts and ordered a review, emphasizing the need for factual evidence in public accusations.
On electoral bonds, PM Modi Today (April 15th) said: “Due to electoral bonds you are getting the trail of the money. Which company gave it? How did they give it? Where did they give it? And that is why I say when they will think honestly, everyone will regret it (on the Supreme Court decision to scrap electoral bonds)”
The Supreme Court of India today refused to suspend the appointment of new Election Commissioners made under a controversial 2023 law. The exclusion of the Chief Justice of India from the selection committee raised concerns. The legal scrutiny stems from appointments overseen by Prime Minister Narendra Modi under the contentious legislation. The petition challenges the Act’s provisions and highlights the debate over the electoral appointment process.
The Bombay High Court Today (March 13th) allowed the Central Government to establish a Fact Checking Unit (FCU) under the amended Information Technology Rules, aiming to identify and address fake content on social media targeting the government. This decision comes after legal challenges and a split opinion within the bench. The FCU is crucial in regulating online content and government oversight.
The Supreme Court Today (March 13th) agreed to review a petition challenging the exclusion of the Chief Justice of India from the committee responsible for appointing the Chief Election Commissioner and other election commissioners. This legal battle highlights the ongoing debate over the independence and impartiality of India’s electoral appointment process.urgence and significance of the hearing is emphasized due to the upcoming elections.
The Supreme Court Bar Association publicly disavows President Adish Aggarwala’s request to the President of India for a presidential reference on the electoral bonds case, regarding it as an attempt to undermine the Supreme Court’s authority. This move raises concerns about the integrity and independence of legal institutions, leaving lingering questions about Aggarwala’s motivations.
Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay, a notable figure in the Calcutta High Court, has resigned Today from his position to pursue a political career. Known for his uncompromising approach to combating corruption, his decision to enter politics has sparked discussions about the future of his cases and the implications for the Indian judiciary.
Prime Minister Modi criticized the Supreme Court, suggesting that even a revered figure like Lord Krishna could be accused of corruption in today’s world. This comes after the Supreme Court invalidated the electoral bonds scheme, citing violations of citizens’ right to information and potential quid pro quo arrangements. The Court mandated immediate disclosure of donation details and cessation of electoral bond issuance.
The Supreme Court of India has struck down the electoral bonds scheme, emphasizing the voters’ entitlement to information about electoral candidates. The scheme was found to disproportionately impact this right and failed to be the least restrictive measure in curbing black money. The Court’s decision marks a significant step towards enhancing transparency and equity in political funding.