UK doctor Sangram Patil’s controversial posts targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi warranted an FIR, Mumbai Police told the Bombay High Court, adding that investigators are also verifying whether Patil breached any conditions attached to his Indian tourist visa.
Today, On 18th August, The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the plea of AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Atishi challenging the Delhi High Court order that refused to quash a defamation case, with Justice Sundresh stating, “We will fix a date.”
A Pune court plea citing a “threat” to Rahul Gandhi’s life was filed by his lawyer without his approval. Gandhi has instructed that the statement be withdrawn immediately, saying he never agreed to it.
Kapil Sibal responded to Vice President Dhankhar’s remark that “Parliament is supreme,” stating that “Constitution is supreme.” He highlighted that neither Parliament nor the Executive has more power than the Constitution, stressing the importance of the Constitution in guiding the country’s laws and governance.
Top government sources emphasized that “respect for judiciary is paramount” amid the ongoing controversy. This statement was made in response to recent tensions between the judiciary and government institutions, highlighting the importance of maintaining the judiciary’s integrity and its vital role in India’s democratic system.
Today, On 19th March, The Supreme Court extended its order exempting former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan from personal appearance in a defamation case. The case pertains to alleged defamatory remarks, and Chouhan had sought relief from mandatory court presence. The Court’s decision spares him from attending proceedings in person. This extension provides temporary legal relief while the case progresses.
A court case has been filed against Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge in Bihar for allegedly hurting Hindu sentiments. The complaint follows his remarks at a rally in Mau, Madhya Pradesh. Kharge had stated that taking a dip in the Ganga does not remove poverty or feed the hungry. His statement has ignited controversy, leading to legal action.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today (27th Jan) raised concerns about the frequent use of Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) by authorities to control protests across India. This section empowers the police to impose restrictions on public gatherings to prevent disturbances.
The Maharashtra police today informed the Bombay High Court that charges of outraging religious sentiments would not be applied to BJP leaders’ remarks about Rohingyas and Bangladeshis, as they were not directed against Indians or any specific community within India. The court disposed of petitions seeking FIRs against the leaders for alleged inflammatory speeches in January.
A BJP leader filed a defamation lawsuit against Arvind Kejriwal and Atishi. The suit stems from accusations of attempting to poach AAP leaders with large sums of money. This legal clash reflects the intense political division in India and is part of a series of contentious exchanges between the two parties, often escalating into legal battles.
