The Patna High Court directed the Government of Bihar to halt eviction of Mahadalit woman Saroj Devi from a Musahar settlement in Begusarai. Justice Ajit Kumar passed the order while hearing her petition.
The Supreme Court dismissed a public interest litigation challenging Manubhai Parmar’s appointment as BPSC chairman, deeming it factless and publicity-driven. The bench criticized petitioner Brajesh for lacking seriousness and proper grounds, emphasizing that PILs must serve genuine public interest. The matter remains under review as responses are awaited.
Today, On 3rd February, The Supreme Court sought a response from the Bihar government on a PIL challenging the appointment of the BPSC chairperson. The petition questions the legality and process of the selection. The court has asked the state to clarify its stance on the matter. Further hearings will determine the validity of the appointment.
![[Bihar Bridge Collapse] "Last Opportunity for State Govt. to Reply on PIL": CJI Sanjiv Khanna](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-55-1.png?resize=321%2C157&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court has given the Bihar government six weeks to respond to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) addressing safety concerns following multiple bridge collapses. Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna highlighted the urgency of the matter, directing both the state and the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) to provide detailed responses.
![[Bihar Bridge Collapse] ‘Frequent Incidents Are Disastrous, Risking Public Safety’: CJI to Address PIL on Structural Failures"](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-21.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 4th November, the Chief Justice of India will review a Public Interest Litigation concerning frequent bridge collapses in Bihar, deemed a public safety hazard. The PIL requests a structural audit and formation of an expert panel to ensure bridge safety, following multiple collapses that threaten lives, particularly in flood-prone areas.
Yesterday, On 25th October, the Supreme Court criticized the Patna High Court for issuing post-dated bail orders that would take effect only after five months. The Supreme Court emphasized the need for timely justice and remanded the cases for reconsideration. This ruling reflects a broader push for transparency in legal proceedings.
The Supreme Court set aside the Bihar government’s cancellation of the 2019 junior engineer selection process, labeling it “impermissible.” The court ordered the Bihar Technical Service Commission to continue appointing candidates based on a fresh select list, emphasizing that altering recruitment rules post-process compromises candidates’ rights. Appointments must be completed within specified timeframes.
The Supreme Court issued a notice to the Bihar Government and Assembly office regarding RJD leader Rambali Singh’s expulsion from the Bihar Assembly. Singh’s petition challenges the decision of the Patna High Court, based on procedural flaws in the complaint against him. The next hearing is scheduled for October 25.
