In the District Judge Bar Quota Row, J&K High Court lawyers warn that the ruling “erodes the independence of the Bar” as they urge Bar associations across India to join a nationwide protest challenging the Supreme Court’s controversial verdict.
Over 200 Kerala lawyers have opposed the Supreme Court’s ruling allowing judicial officers with seven years’ combined experience to be appointed as District Judges under the Bar quota. They claim the decision weakens the Bar’s exclusive constitutional right under Article 233(2).
A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court against the quashing of the amendment to the MP Higher Judicial Service Rules, stating, “The amendment is not a new recruitment method, but only a conditional adjustment within the framework.”
The Supreme Court has reserved its verdict on whether judicial officers with seven years’ prior Bar experience can apply for district judge posts under the Bar quota. The ruling will clarify the scope of Article 233 and impact judicial recruitment nationwide.
The Supreme Court expressed concern that “brilliant candidates” quit lower judiciary due to years of stagnation without promotion. A Constitution Bench is hearing if prior Bar experience can count towards eligibility for district judge posts under Article 233.
