Today, On 19th May, The Supreme Court has now asked the Bar Council of India to respond to a PIL challenging the Rs.3,500 fee for the AIBE. Earlier in February, the Court declined to hear the PIL but allowed a representation to BCI.
Today, On 24th February, The Supreme Court refused to hear a plea challenging the Rs.3,500 fee for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE). The court noted that it has already set limits on enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils and the Bar Council of India (BCI). Imposing more restrictions could financially strain these bodies. The ruling highlights the necessity of maintaining bar councils’ financial stability.
The Bar Council of India (BCI) initiated a nationwide verification process for advocates in response to increasing cases of fake law degrees. This step aims to uphold the integrity of the legal profession by identifying and eliminating fraudulent practitioners. The BCI emphasized the importance of ensuring that only qualified and genuine advocates practice law in India.
The Bar Council of India (BCI) approached the Supreme Court for permission to increase enrolment fees, saying it is facing a financial crisis. In July 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that State Bar Councils and the BCI cannot charge fees above the limit set by the Advocates Act. The BCI claims that the current fee limit is making it difficult for them to work properly. They have requested higher fees to improve their financial situation.
The Bar Council of India removed Sanjeev Nasiar, AAP’s legal cell head, due to doubts about his LLB degree’s authenticity. AAP criticized the decision as politically motivated. The BCI emphasized integrity in the legal profession and referred the case to the CBI, highlighting concerns over professional ethics and accountability.
Today, On 6th December, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition against lawyers affiliated with political parties participating in Bar Council elections, asserting that political beliefs do not disqualify their involvement. The Court emphasized the independence of bar associations and allowed individuals to hold office despite political ideologies, highlighting the need for balancing responsibilities and beliefs.
Today, On 29th November, the Supreme Court of India will rule on whether lawyers can also work as journalists, following a case involving Advocate Mohd. Kamran. The Court questioned Kamran’s dual roles, emphasizing the need for ethical clarity. A decision will be made on December 16 regarding potential conflicts of interest in such professions.
