![[Lawyers Ads Controversy] Sulekha Moves Supreme Court Against Madras High Court Order](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Image-1-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Madras High Court mandated the Bar Council of India (BCI) to establish guidelines against lawyer advertising. In response, Sulekha challenged the directive in the Supreme Court, which has combined it with JustDial’s similar plea. The Court is evaluating compliance with the Advocates Act and BCI regulations amid concerns about online lawyer services.
Today, On 6th November, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition regarding lawyers’ mental health, urging Bar Associations to provide support instead of seeking court intervention. The Chief Justice emphasized the importance of proactive measures for mental wellness in the legal profession, highlighting a significant lack of targeted resources in India compared to other countries.
The Supreme Court today seeks Bar Council of India’s response to JustDial’s appeal against a Madras High Court ruling on lawyer advertisements. The Court emphasized compliance with Advocates Act and BCI regulations. JustDial argued for its role as a directory service. BCI had issued removal notice to comply with the High Court’s order. Supreme Court awaits BCI’s response.
The General Counsels’ Association of India and the Society of Indian Law Firms advocate for statutory recognition and privilege for general counsels in India. With over 50,000 practicing, they seek recognition as legal practitioners under Indian law, emphasizing the need for regulation and amendments to ensure their rights and status. The proposed changes aim to integrate general counsels into the broader legal ecosystem.
The Madras High Court dismissed a PIL seeking to reduce the All India Bar Examination fee of Rs. 3,500, stating it is reasonable and not excessive. The court emphasized the absence of statutory provisions regulating the fee and highlighted the judiciary’s role in maintaining the integrity of professional examinations while encouraging ongoing discussions about fairness.
Today, On 13th June, Delhi High Court demands report on inadequate facilities at DU Law Faculty following a petition by three students. The Court appointed an amicus curiae and directed a meeting between stakeholders to address issues such as air conditioning, drinking water, and WiFi. The next hearing is set for July 4, with advocates representing both the petitioners and Delhi University.
Today, 22nd April, The Supreme Court set a maximum advocate enrollment fee at Rs. 600 to standardize the process and promote fairness. This decision addresses financial challenges faced by marginalized communities and aims to ensure accessibility and transparency. The move sparked a wider discussion about the barriers to legal practice and could influence future legal education and practice.
A group of Delhi-based lawyers has approached the Delhi High Court, contesting a groundbreaking notification by the Bar Council of India (BCI) that greenlights the entry of foreign law firms and legal practitioners into India. This petition, spearheaded by Advocates Narendra Sharma, Arvind Kumar Bajpai, Siddharth Srivastav, Ekta Mehta, Arvind Kumar, Sanjeev Sareen, Harish Kumar […]
The Supreme Court of India has emphasized the importance of transparency in disciplinary proceedings conducted by the Bar Council of India (BCI), stating that the BCI must ensure the English translation of documents not originally in English. This directive aims to facilitate clearer understanding and efficiency in handling cases of professional misconduct among members of […]