“Courts Cannot Act Beyond Pleadings”: Rajasthan High Court Quashes FIR & Bailable Warrants in Govt Housing Eviction Case

The Rajasthan High Court’s Division Bench set aside controversial orders that treated a personal writ like a PIL and directed FIR registration. The Court ruled that judges cannot exceed the scope of relief sought in petitions, reinforcing strict judicial discipline.

Appeared on VC and Threatened the Bench: Delhi High Court Orders Man to Appear in Person

The Delhi High Court sharply rebuked a man already facing criminal contempt for repeatedly threatening judges. It directed contemnor to appear personally on March 23, warning that non-compliance would trigger coercive steps to secure his presence.

Scandalous and Frivolous Allegations Against Judges: Supreme Court Directs Delhi Police Commissioner to Ensure Lawyer Appears in Court

Today, On 6th February, The Supreme Court directed the Delhi Police Commissioner to ensure lawyer Mukut Nath Verma appears in court. Verma has allegedly made “scandalous and frivolous” allegations against Supreme Court judges and members of the SCBA election committee.

Supreme Court Criticizes Trial Court Order: ‘No Bailable Warrants Should Be Issued in Domestic Violence Cases’

The Supreme Court of India criticized a Magistrate’s issuance of bailable warrants against Alisha Berry in a domestic violence case filed by her mother-in-law under the D.V. Act. The Court deemed the warrants unnecessary and agreed to transfer the case from Delhi to Ludhiana, highlighting the quasi-criminal nature of D.V. proceedings.