Today, On 1st December, The Supreme Court granted bail to a man accused of cheating by pretending to be Amit Shah’s nephew, noting he has already spent years in custody while the trial has barely progressed. The bench said the case’s slow pace justified granting bail now.
The Bombay High Court has granted bail to Kafeel Ahmed Mohammed Ayub, arrested in the 2011 Mumbai triple blasts that killed 27 people. Ayub, in custody since 2012, was released on a Rs 1 lakh surety after spending over a decade in jail.
The Supreme Court has ordered the release of Danish, Faizan, and Nazir, arrested over the 2024 Sambhal clashes during a survey near Shahi Jama Masjid. The trio had been in custody for nearly a year as the case continues to stir political debate in Uttar Pradesh.
The Supreme Court directs all High Courts to issue circulars ensuring expeditious trials, especially in sensitive cases, stressing continuous examination of witnesses and strict adherence to Section 309 CrPC. The move aims to uphold the right to a speedy trial under Article 21.
Supreme Court questions Karnataka High Court’s decision to grant bail to Kannada actor Darshan in the Renukaswamy murder case. Bench says it’s “not convinced” with how the order was passed.
Today, On 27th June, The Uttar Pradesh government paid man Rs.5 lakh as compensation for illegal detention following the Supreme Court criticism to the State for keeping the man in jail for nearly a month even after he was granted bail.
Today, On 25th June, The Supreme Court sharply criticised Uttar Pradesh jail officials for unlawfully keeping a man in Ghaziabad jail despite a clear bail order, calling it a serious violation of personal liberty and raising concerns over systemic injustice.
The Supreme Court of India criticized the Ghaziabad jail authorities for failing to release a man granted bail in April under the Uttar Pradesh anti-conversion law, deeming it a “travesty of justice.” The court demanded an explanation from the jailor regarding the delay, attributing it to a minor legal technicality that undermines personal liberty.
Today, On 23rd June, The Supreme Court criticised an accused for withdrawing a voluntary bail payout offer, saying, “It undermines the sanctity of the judicial process and amounts to playing ‘ducks and drakes’ with the court,” stressing accountability in bail conditions.
The Supreme Court emphasized that granting bail under special laws with restrictions must depend on fulfilling the required conditions. Setting aside the Bombay High Court’s decision to grant bail in a strict MCOCA case, the bench noted that courts cannot examine evidence in detail to form a definite view on the accused’s role during bail hearings. The ruling reinforces the importance of adhering to legal standards in such cases. The court highlighted that bail decisions must align with the specific provisions of special laws.
