The Supreme Court rejected a PIL seeking action against political parties’ alleged unlawful acts, calling it a “publicity interest litigation” and directing the petitioner to approach the High Court. CJI B R Gavai also warned the counsel over courtroom conduct.
Today, On 25th July, Supreme Court, stating “Under Article 32 Plea Is Permitted,” allows Kerala to withdraw petition challenging Governor’s inaction, despite Centre’s suggestion to refer the matter to a larger bench due to pending constitutional questions.
SC reminds students that Article 32 is not a shortcut, advises petitioner to seek remedy under Article 226 before High Court. Reinforces judicial hierarchy in education-related disputes.
Yogendra Yadav has filed a PIL in the Supreme Court challenging the ECI’s voter list revision in Bihar, claiming it is arbitrary and unjust. He argues it could disenfranchise millions, particularly marginalized groups, due to stringent document requirements. Yadav alleges this violates fundamental rights and requests immediate intervention to protect voters.
The Supreme Court of India declined to hear a petition for the early release of the NEET-UG 2025 final answer key, stating such matters should first be addressed in High Courts. The Court emphasized practical concerns and the established process, allowing students to challenge results later, while avoiding potential mass litigation.
The Supreme Court of India refused to halt Andhra Pradesh’s ongoing teacher recruitment exams, which have begun and will run until July 6. The Court advised petitioners to approach the state High Court after its summer vacation. Concerns about exam conduct were raised, but the Court emphasized it would not intervene mid-process.
While hearing the petition, the Supreme Court declined to go into the full details of the matter but allowed the petitioners to seek relief before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. New Delhi, June 9th – The Supreme Court of India has granted interim protection from arrest to two Madhya Pradesh-based journalists who have alleged custodial […]
Today, On 19th May, Supreme Court refuses to entertain Article 32 plea in Ayodhya land acquisition case against UP Housing Board. Tells petitioners to approach High Court: “If every state comes to SC, what will happen?”
NEW DELHI: 13th May: The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday dismissed a petition that had requested a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe into the recent communal clashes that took place in Murshidabad, West Bengal. These clashes occurred during protests related to the Waqf (Amendment) Act.
The Supreme Court of India fined advocate Sandeep Todi Rs. 5 lakh for filing a frivolous plea under Article 32 aimed at staying reliefs granted in a family dispute case. The court criticized the petition’s baselessness, stating it harmed the court’s atmosphere, and mandated the fine be paid to the National Legal Services Authority.
