Minority schools have approached the Delhi High Court challenging a new law that makes government approval mandatory for school fee increases. They argue the law violates Article 30 of the Constitution, which protects minority institutions’ right to manage their own affairs.
Justice Surya Kant criticized a 1981 Supreme Court reference questioning the Chief Justice’s authority regarding Aligarh Muslim University’s minority status, labeling it “bad in law.” He emphasized judicial integrity, asserting that a two-judge bench cannot challenge larger bench rulings, and highlighted the Chief Justice’s role in maintaining judicial clarity and authority within the system.
![[BREAKING] "Statutory Creation Doesn't Nullify Minority Status Of AMU': Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/AMU.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, overturned the 1967 Azeez Basha decision, affirming that statutory incorporation does not negate an institution’s minority status. The Court emphasized the founders’ identity and intent, stating that AMU’s status requires examination of its establishment by minority community members.
AIMIM President Asaduddin Owaisi opposes Allahabad High Court’s ruling on Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Act, citing constitutional provisions for educational autonomy under Articles 29 and 30. He questions the UP government’s intentions and vows legal action, emphasizing the cultural and educational significance of madrasas in the Muslim community. Owaisi’s stance sparks a critical debate.
The Supreme Court of India is currently deliberating on the minority status of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) in a pivotal hearing. The interpretation and implications of Article 30 of the Constitution are being examined, with arguments centering on whether a university established and governed by statute can claim minority status. The decision will have significant implications for minority educational institutions nationwide.
The Supreme Court of India, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, emphasized that minority educational institutions can include others in administration without losing their minority status, as protected by Article 30(1) of the Indian Constitution. This inclusive interpretation reinforces the autonomy and rights of minority institutions, with ongoing proceedings to determine the future framework of minority rights in education. Arguments to continue on 23rd JAN, 2024.
The Supreme Court of India, under the leadership of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, initiated a critical examination of the minority status of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) on January 9. This landmark case is being scrutinized by a seven-judge bench, including Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Surya Kant, JB Pardiwala, Dipankar Datta, Manoj Misra, and SC Sharma. The […]
A Landmark Case on Educational Rights and Minority Protections The Supreme Court of India is poised to undertake a pivotal constitutional examination regarding the minority status of educational institutions, a matter that has garnered significant attention due to its implications on educational rights and minority protections in India. The focus of this examination is the […]