The Supreme Court has reserved its verdict on whether judicial officers with seven years’ prior Bar experience can apply for district judge posts under the Bar quota. The ruling will clarify the scope of Article 233 and impact judicial recruitment nationwide.
The Supreme Court, led by CJI BR Gavai, continued hearing Rejanish K.V. v. K. Deepa & Ors, debating whether judges with prior advocacy experience qualify under the advocates’ quota for District Judge appointments. Senior counsels stressed Article 233 protects both promotion and direct recruitment streams, ensuring judicial independence.
The Supreme Court upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s mandate for judicial officer promotions, requiring a minimum 50% interview score. It dismissed challenges to the criterion, affirming the High Court’s autonomy. The ruling emphasizes the importance of merit and competency in judicial appointments, setting a significant precedent for India’s legal system.
