The Supreme Court ruled that the existence of a disputed question of fact does not bar the High Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226. If the State raises disputes merely to justify rejecting a writ petition, the court must dismiss such objections. The ruling reinforces the High Court’s power to intervene in cases of constitutional rights violations. This ensures that legal remedies are not denied on technical grounds.
Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has revolutionized the Indian judicial system by enabling ordinary citizens to approach courts for the greater good of society. PIL serves as a powerful tool to uphold justice, protect fundamental rights, and address issues that impact large sections of the population. Whether it’s environmental protection, human rights violations, or accountability in governance, PIL ensures that justice reaches even the most marginalized communities.
On December 2, the Supreme Court temporarily released YSRCP social media in-charge Sajjala Bhargava Reddy, allowing him to approach the High Court regarding multiple FIRs alleging derogatory online posts about Andhra Pradesh CM Chandrababu Naidu. The court granted him two weeks of protection from arrest while emphasizing the importance of High Courts.
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a PIL against Rahul Gandhi for alleged objectionable remarks, calling it “misconceived” and imposing a Rs 25,000 fine on the All India Dalit Action Committee. The court advised politicians to uphold decorum in speeches and emphasized that such matters are beyond judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court on Monday (18th Nov) has issued a notice to the Centre regarding the non-appointment of chairpersons in 11 Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs), seeking a response within five weeks. The case highlights delays affecting efficient debt recovery, emphasizing the right to speedy justice and requesting interim measures to ensure tribunal functionality while vacancies persist.
The Madras High Court annulled a 20-year-old woman’s marriage to her former teacher, citing coercion and lack of understanding during the signing of marriage papers. The court voided the registration, emphasizing the importance of consent and personal autonomy. The teacher agreed to end the marriage, allowing the woman to pursue her education.
Justice Sanjiv Khanna will assume office as India’s 51st Chief Justice on November 11, focusing on reducing the Supreme Court’s backlog of over 82,000 cases. Upholding judicial integrity and citizen rights, he emphasizes timely justice and effective case management, while also valuing his privacy amidst increasing responsibilities in the judiciary.
The Supreme Court ruled that High Court judges must adhere to jurisdiction assigned by the Chief Justice, prohibiting them from reclassifying petitions without consent. In a case concerning the dismissal of a writ petition, the Court upheld this authority, emphasizing that jurisdictional assignment is crucial for judges when hearing cases.
Delhi High Court today dismisses plea challenging Bihar CM Nitish Kumar’s election as JDU President. Former JDU member Govind Yadav’s plea lacked merit and was ruled out by Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav. The plea aimed to annul changes in JDU’s records, which violated the Representation of the People Act. The court concluded that the requested reliefs were beyond the Act’s scope.
