Supreme Court’s order de-rostering an Allahabad HC judge sparks outrage among top judges. CJI Gavai seeks to resolve breach of judicial norms and natural justice.
The Supreme Court dissolved a marriage under Article 142 after 9 years of litigation across 3 states, marking a historic resolution through mutual consent and mediation.
Supreme Court dissolves IPS officer’s marriage using Article 142 and orders unconditional apology for filing 15 cases. All litigations quashed; both parties agree to move on peacefully.
Supreme Court upholds Allahabad HC’s guidelines giving 2-month arrest protection in dowry cases under IPC 498A. Orders IPS officer to publish apology for wrongful jail of husband and in-laws.
Supreme Court mandates a 2-month cooling-off period before any arrest under Section 498A IPC. Approves Allahabad HC’s safeguards to curb misuse in matrimonial disputes.
Today, On 21st July, CJI B.R. Gavai-led bench slammed the ED for summoning lawyers merely for giving legal advice, calling it a breach of client confidentiality. “Lawyers can’t be summoned; such advice is protected by privileged communication,” the court said.
CJI B.R. Gavai emphasized the significance of the Indian Constitution in safeguarding citizens’ rights, particularly against illegal demolitions termed “bulldozer justice.” The Supreme Court mandated due process before any demolition, highlighting the fundamental right to shelter under Article 21. It protects citizens from arbitrary actions by authorities while ensuring justice and dignity.
Today, On 23rd May, Using its special powers under Article 142, the Supreme Court acquitted a man earlier convicted under the POCSO Act for having a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl, citing the need to deliver complete justice.
The Madras High Court upheld its interim stay on Tamil Nadu legislation altering the Governor’s authority to appoint Vice-Chancellors, asserting potential unconstitutionality. It refuted claims of interfering with a Supreme Court decision, emphasizing judicial duty and the necessity of addressing unconstitutional laws without delay, reinforcing commitments to justice and constitutional integrity.
CJI B.R. Gavai expressed strong displeasure over a protocol lapse during his first visit to Maharashtra after taking charge, stating, “If it were someone else, Article 142 would have been invoked immediately.”
