The Supreme Court has stayed the 100-metre height-based definition of the Aravalli Hills, warning that illegal mining causes irreversible environmental damage. The Court has ordered a high-powered expert committee to re-examine ecological, mining and conservation concerns.
The Aravalli story highlights a major environmental battle after the Supreme Court stayed its November 20 order redefining the hills. The pause came after strong public and scientific pressure, reflecting growing concern over mining, ecology, and North India’s fragile environmental future.
Union Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision to stay its earlier order on the uniform definition of the Aravalli hills and to form a new expert committee. He reaffirmed that the government remains committed to protecting and restoring the Aravalli range, with the mining ban continuing.
The Supreme Court said public criticism over the new Aravalli definition arises from perceived ambiguity and lack of clarity in its directions. The court has kept its earlier order in abeyance and will seek expert opinion before finalising the definition.
The Supreme Court has stayed its recent verdict on the Aravalli Hills, citing widespread misinterpretation of its observations and an expert committee report. Notices have been issued to the Union government and States as the Court seeks fresh, independent expert inputs.
Supreme Court’s recent definition of the Aravalli Hills has come under scrutiny. Advocate Hitendra Gandhi urged the Chief Justice of India to review the ruling, warning that the ‘100-Metre Test’ may weaken critical environmental protections.
The Supreme Court granted a final extension till October 15 for a panel to submit a “uniform definition” of the Aravalli hills, stressing protection over punishment. The bench warned that uncontrolled mining poses a serious threat to the region’s ecology.
