The Supreme Court slammed the appellate court’s “shocking” move of cancelling bail and issuing an NBW against a woman despite her appeal pending for eight years. Citing serious procedural lapses and her medical condition, the Court ordered her immediate release on interim bail.
The Delhi High Court upheld a conviction in a sexual harassment case, highlighting the persistent issue of women’s safety. The court remarked that even after decades of independence, women continue to face harassment in public spaces, including transport. It stressed the need for stricter measures to ensure their security.
Legal experts have stated that the family of a crime victim is not powerless and can approach the High Court to request a sentence enhancement in serious cases. This power is in addition to the state’s legal authority. The family can petition the appellate court for a tougher sentence in heinous crimes. This ensures that victims’ families have a voice in the judicial process.
![[CLAT 2025 Questions Errors] Single Judge 'Charitable' in Calling CLAT Questions 'Demonstrably Wrong': Delhi HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CLAT-2025-Question-Errors-_-Law-Aspirant-Files-An-Appeal-In-Delhi-HC-Challenging-Single-Judges-Verdict.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court, On Tuesday(24th Dec) led by Acting CJ Vibhu Bhakru, addressed a challenge to CLAT 2025 regarding errors in the English comprehension section. Justice Jyoti Singh had previously identified mistakes affecting candidates’ results and mandated revisions. The NLU Consortium has since contested this judgment, claiming it overstepped judicial boundaries.
The Supreme Court today(26th Sept) confirmed that the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, applies to all women in India, safeguarding their constitutional rights. The ruling stemmed from a case concerning maintenance, emphasizing that modifications under Section 25 are only applicable for changes post-initial orders. Previous appeals were dismissed, allowing for future applications under the Act.
Today, 12th April,The Supreme Court (SC) ruled that acquittals can’t be reversed based solely on alternative interpretations, emphasizing the importance of legal standards in reviewing acquittals. Justices Oka and Bhuyan’s bench stated that unless an appellate court deems an acquittal judgment as perverse, it cannot intervene. The court’s decision reinforces the presumption of innocence and highlights burden of proof principles, ultimately acquitting the appellants in a murder case.
Supreme Court temporarily suspends actress Jayaprada’s sentence in ESIC case, granting her interim bail pending appeal. Jayaprada and her brothers face allegations related to failure to remit ESI deductions to the corporation from their bankrupt cinema. The decision follows a series of legal proceedings, including a denial of suspension of sentence by the Delhi High Court.
The refusal by the Madras High Court to grant a stay on the conviction of former DGP Rajesh Das serves as a reminder of the judiciary’s unwavering commitment to justice. It highlights the challenges of navigating legal and ethical standards in positions of authority and the imperative for the legal system to hold individuals accountable […]
