A litigant and two advocates apologised to Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya after the Supreme Court directed them for making “scurrilous and scandalous” remarks. The SC reminded that “judges of high courts are in no way inferior to judges of the Supreme Court.”
Delhi High Court gives Lakshmi Puri time to review Saket Gokhale’s fresh apology affidavit. Court notes mismatch between earlier directed and newly filed apology.
Today (2nd April): The Supreme Court chastised Patanjali Ayurved for airing misleading advertisements for its ayurvedic products, demanding a more substantial apology for breaching its commitment. The Court expressed disappointment in Patanjali’s casual apology affidavit and hinted at perjury charges due to document discrepancies. Both Ramdev and Patanjali’s Managing Director are required to appear personally at the next hearing.
