The Telangana High Court refused interim protection from arrest to Bandi Bhageerath in a POCSO case, with Justice T Madhavi Devi observing she was not inclined to grant interim relief after examining the victim’s statement.
The Erattupetta Munsif Magistrate Court denied PC George’s bail plea, leading to his remand in judicial custody. The BJP leader faced legal action over an alleged hate speech that sparked controversy. The court rejected his request for relief, citing the seriousness of the charges. His detention marks another high-profile case involving political figures and inflammatory remarks.
Today, On 28th January, The Kerala High Court has advised right-wing activist Rahul Easwar to advocate for the rights of all citizens, not just men. Justice PV Kunhikrishnan emphasized that Easwar should broaden his focus to include everyone, regardless of gender. This direction came during a case where Easwar’s activism was seen to primarily address men’s issues. The Court highlighted the need for inclusive advocacy for all sections of society.
![[IAS Exam Controversy] Took Exam 12 Times, But Don't Consider 7 Of Those: Puja Khedkar To Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-159.png?resize=447%2C309&ssl=1)
Puja Khedkar, a former IAS trainee, is seeking the exclusion of seven out of her twelve attempts at the Civil Services exam due to a disability, prompting a legal battle. The controversy also involves allegations of falsified disability claims and identity fraud, which led to the UPSC revoking her selection. The case is ongoing in the Delhi High Court.
![[BREAKING] Delhi Court Grants Bail to AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan in ED Case on Rs 15,000 Personal Bond](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/MicrosoftTeams-image-22.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today (15th April): The Supreme Court rejected AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan’s anticipatory bail plea in the Delhi Waqf Board money laundering case. The Court instructed him to appear before the Enforcement Directorate for interrogation on April 18th. The decision was based on Khan’s recurrent failure to respond to summonses, seen as obstructing justice. The case pertains to alleged irregularities during Khan’s tenure as chairman.