The Supreme Court has listed for January 20 a batch of petitions challenging anti-conversion laws enacted by nine States, including UP, MP and Gujarat. The Court has directed all States to file their counter affidavits within three weeks.
Today, On 28th November, Supreme Court has sought the Rajasthan government’s response to a petition challenging the validity of the Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2025. The plea alleges the law contains arbitrary and unreasonable provisions that violate rights.
The Supreme Court declined an urgent hearing on petitions challenging anti-conversion laws enacted by states like Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, and Madhya Pradesh, with CJI BR Gavai remarking, “It is not possible, I have to write judgments,” scheduling the matter for December.
Goa CM Pramod Sawant advocates for anti-conversion laws, citing recent cases of ‘love jihad’ and stressing the need to curb alleged forced religious conversions in the state.
The Supreme Court will take up multiple petitions concerning religious conversions Today (April 16). These pleas question the legality and implications of forced or fraudulent conversions across the country.
The Supreme Court will take up multiple petitions concerning religious conversions on April 16. These pleas question the legality and implications of forced or fraudulent conversions across the country. The issue has sparked widespread debate over religious freedom and state regulations. The court’s hearing is expected to clarify the legal stance on the matter.
Senior Advocate and former Chief Justice of the Orissa High Court, Dr. S Muralidhar, recently expressed strong concerns about India’s anti-conversion laws. Speaking at an ADF India panel discussion on February 28, he highlighted how these laws undermine personal freedom and choice.
A law firm in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, won the release of 11 Christians detained under anti-conversion laws after two months of effort. The firm’s pro bono services and commitment to justice were evident in their relentless fight. The case highlights challenges faced by religious minorities in regions governed by the Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
