The Supreme Court of India declined to hear a petition for the early release of the NEET-UG 2025 final answer key, stating such matters should first be addressed in High Courts. The Court emphasized practical concerns and the established process, allowing students to challenge results later, while avoiding potential mass litigation.
Today, On 24th December, After Madhya Pradesh, the Bombay High Court asked the NLU consortium to respond to a plea against the CLAT PG 2025 exam. The CLAT 2025 exam has faced criticism due to claims of incorrect answer keys for both UG and PG exams. Many candidates questioned the fairness of the evaluation process, leading to legal cases in different courts. The NLU consortium’s reply is expected to explain its position and address these concerns.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court issued a notice to the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) over a writ petition challenging the final answer key and high fees for the CLAT 2025 PG exam. Petitioner Ayush Agrawal raised concerns about alleged errors in the answer key, lack of transparency, and hefty fees for filing objections (Rs 1,000 per challenge) and exam registration (Rs 4,000). The court has directed the selection process to remain provisional until the petition is resolved, with the next hearing scheduled for January 8, 2025.
The NLU Consortium has appealed to the Delhi High Court against a ruling that required revising CLAT 2025 results due to errors identified in the exam questions. The court acknowledged mistakes in two questions and mandated corrections, while the Consortium argues this judicial intervention oversteps boundaries on academic matters. Both sides await further hearings.
