Today, On 18th August, The Supreme Court raised concerns over the appointment of Naima Khatoon as AMU Vice-Chancellor, remarking, “Husband’s participation in wife’s appointment raises doubts,” stressing that decisions must not only be done properly but also be seen as proper.
The Supreme Court of India directed Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) to pay stipends within two weeks to 11 foreign medical interns, emphasizing equal treatment with Indian graduates. The court ruled that all medical interns are entitled to stipends, ensuring no discrimination. AMU is to fund the stipends independently and is protected from UGC repercussions.
Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath criticized Aligarh Muslim University for its 50% Muslim reservation, questioning its fairness to SCs, STs, and OBCs, despite central funding. He emphasized the need for equal opportunities as mandated by the Constitution and pointed out political parties hindering favorable policies for electoral gain.
The Supreme Court of India On Day 8 has reserved its verdict on the status of AMU Aligarh Muslim University as a minority institution. The case raises fundamental questions about minority rights and the interpretation of Article 30 of the Constitution. The decision is anticipated to set a precedent for minority educational institutions in India and has far-reaching implications for minority rights in the country.
The Supreme Court of India emphasized the minority status of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), stressing its establishment for Muslims. A crucial debate ensued regarding the coexistence of national importance and minority character. The ongoing examination has significant implications for India’s educational landscape, shedding light on minority rights and institutional roles in a diverse society.
The Centre emphasized to the Supreme Court the need for national reflection in institutions of national significance like Aligarh Muslim University. Solicitor General highlighted the absence of reservation and the institution’s importance. The case revolves around AMU’s minority status, with ongoing deliberation by a seven-judge constitution bench. The hearing continues on Wednesday.
The Supreme Court expressed surprise at the Central Government’s refusal to recognize the 1981 amendment granting minority status to Aligarh Muslim University. The Court emphasized the government’s obligation to stand by parliamentary actions, while the Solicitor General cited a high court verdict striking down the amendment. The discussion will continue on January 30.
In a recent hearing of the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) case, the Solicitor General of India voiced opposition to a 1981 parliamentary amendment granting minority status to AMU. This led to astonishment from the Chief Justice and a broader discussion on the role of law officers in supporting parliamentary amendments, raising complex constitutional law questions in India.
The Supreme Court of India is currently deliberating on the minority status of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) in a pivotal hearing. The interpretation and implications of Article 30 of the Constitution are being examined, with arguments centering on whether a university established and governed by statute can claim minority status. The decision will have significant implications for minority educational institutions nationwide.
The Supreme Court of India, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, emphasized that minority educational institutions can include others in administration without losing their minority status, as protected by Article 30(1) of the Indian Constitution. This inclusive interpretation reinforces the autonomy and rights of minority institutions, with ongoing proceedings to determine the future framework of minority rights in education. Arguments to continue on 23rd JAN, 2024.