The Supreme Court hailed Justice Kurian Joseph’s “extraordinary artistry” in mediation after he resolved a 27-year-old property dispute. The landmark settlement showcases mediation’s rising power in ending long-running legal battles.
CJI BR Gavai stressed that mediation and dialogue can turn conflicts into opportunities for growth and harmony, citing the importance of the Mediation Act, 2023. Speaking at the National Mediation Conference in Bhubaneswar, he underlined the role of mediation in reducing case pendency and building trust in justice delivery.
NALSA and the SC Mediation Panel will launch a 90-day “Mediation For the Nation” campaign from July 1, 2025, to promote cost-effective dispute resolution across India. This initiative aims to resolve pending cases through mediation, encouraging a faster and more amicable process while alleviating the burden on courts and preserving relationships.
President Murmu and CJI Khanna advocated for mediation as a superior approach to justice during the National Mediation Conference, highlighting its ability to ease court congestion and foster social harmony. They stressed mediation’s role in restoring relationships and its significance in the Indian legal system, encouraging broader awareness and implementation.
Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna emphasized the significance of mediation as a preferred alternative to traditional court litigation during the National Mediation Conference 2025. He highlighted that mediation addresses complexities, fosters relationships, and facilitates a holistic approach to conflict resolution. The newly launched Mediation Association aims to promote this practice across India, especially in rural areas.
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar emphasized the need for India to expand its presence in international commercial arbitration, stating that reliance solely on retired judges is insufficient. While acknowledging their expertise, he stressed the importance of including subject-matter specialists to strengthen the arbitration process. He also criticized excessive Article 136 interventions by the Supreme Court, arguing that what was meant to be a limited review mechanism is now disrupting the arbitral system.