BREAKING | District Judge Quota Row | Have No Intention of Curbing High Courts’ Discretion: Supreme Court

Today, On 29th October, During the All India Judges Association Case hearing, The Supreme Court clarified that it has no intention of curbing the discretion of High Courts in recommending names for appointments but questioned why each High Court is following a different policy in the process.

BREAKING | District Judge Quota Row | Why Should Each High Court Follow a Different Policy?: CJI Gavai

Today, On 29th October, During the All India Judges Association Case hearing, CJI BR Gavai questioned why different High Courts follow varying policies for District Judge appointments, hinting at the need for a uniform system across India’s judiciary.

BREAKING| Counting Earlier Civil Judge Experience Is a Double Benefit: Supreme Court on Fairness in District Judge Promotions

The Supreme Court, hearing the All India Judges Association v. Union of India case, questioned if prior Civil Judge experience should count twice in promotions. Justice Joymalya Bagchi warned that such practice could distort equality in the District Judge cadre.

BREAKING| If Seniority Alone Decides Promotions, What Motivation Remains?: Supreme Court On All India Judges Case

The Supreme Court’s Constitution Bench, led by CJI BR Gavai, wrapped up the All India Judges Association hearing, questioning if promotions based solely on seniority kill merit. Justice Surya Kant’s sharp remarks reignited the debate on fairness in judicial career growth.

Judicial ACRs || “Ensure Timely Recording For Faster Promotions”: Supreme Court Urges High Courts

Today, On 21st January, The Supreme Court directed High Courts to ensure timely recording of Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) for judicial officers. Delays in ACR evaluations often hinder the promotion process, affecting career progression. The apex court emphasized the importance of maintaining efficiency and transparency in the judiciary.

“Avoid Personal Criticism of Judges, Criticise Erroneous Judgments”: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court admonished high courts against personal critiques of trial judges when addressing judicial errors, recognizing the significant case backlog and low judge-to-population ratio. It emphasized that while correcting judgments is necessary, personal remarks can create prejudice, stressing the need for systemic support rather than individual criticism of judges.