J&K And Ladakh High Court Makes AIBE Mandatory For Advocates Who Graduated From 2009-10 Onwards

The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh has notified that advocates who graduated from the 2009-10 academic year onwards must pass the All India Bar Examination, and that those already qualified must file their Certificates of Practice with the Registry.

Kerala High Court Directs Bar Council To Update And Publish The List Of Advocates Who Have Not Cleared The AIBE

The Kerala High Court has directed the Bar Council of Kerala to update, within eight weeks, its list of advocates who have not cleared the All India Bar Examination, extending it to enrolments from 2021 onwards, and to publish the list and continue reviewing defaults. The direction follows a PIL flagging an RTI reply that disclosed over 1,150 advocates in Kerala who had not passed the AIBE. District Judges are to be intimated and act accordingly.

Supreme Court To Examine Whether The BCI Has The Power To Regulate Law Colleges And Control Legal Education

The Supreme Court has said it will examine whether the Bar Council of India, as the statutory regulator of the legal profession, has the power to control and regulate law colleges and universities. Hearing pleas concerning the BCI-PEARL FIRST Trust and law institutions it has set up, the Court questioned how the BCI could be an expert body on legal education, observing that a regulator cannot itself run the institutions it is meant to regulate.

BCI Decisions Including NALSAR Action Taken Without Member Deliberation, A Bar Council Member Tells Supreme Court

A member of the Bar Council of India has told the Supreme Court, in an affidavit, that important decisions have repeatedly been taken in the BCI’s name without deliberation among its members, including the August 13 action to bar the enrolment of NALSAR’s 2026 batch, which he says was never placed before the General Council. He also alleges the Attorney General and Solicitor General, ex-officio members, were not given notices or agendas of BCI meetings. The allegations are untested.

Whatever Catches Your Imagination Becomes the Subject Matter: Delhi High Court Slams Plea Seeking Negative Marking in AIBE Exam

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking negative marking in the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) and criticized petitioner stating, “The difficulty is you read the newspaper in the morning and whatever catches your imagination becomes the subject matter of a PIL.”

AIBE Will Be Conducted at Least Twice a Year, Final Semester Students Will Be Allowed to Sit: BCI Tells Supreme Court

Today, on 20th January, The Supreme Court was informed that the Bar Council of India has framed rules permitting final semester law students to appear for the All India Bar Examination. Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta AIBE will be held twice yearly.

Special Electoral Roll Revision Row: Supreme Court Defers Hearing on Challenges to EC’s SIR to Jan 13

Today, On 8th January, The Supreme Court has deferred to January 13 the hearing on petitions challenging the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. The pleas question the legality and transparency of the EC’s SIR process ahead of upcoming elections.

SIR Across States: Supreme Court Reschedules Special Intensive Revision Hearing For Tomorrow

Today, On 6th December, Supreme Court rescheduled the Special Intensive Revision hearing for tomorrow. Senior Advocate Dwivedi highlighted the Election Commission’s powers and citizen-centric constitutional provisions, while CJI noted, “If we are able to take up at 12 then we will continue till lunch.”

650 Lawyers Under Scrutiny| Verify Advocates Representing Govt In Supreme Court Yet To Clear AIBE: Delhi HC Tells Centre

The Delhi High Court directs Centre to verify claims that lawyers appointed to represent the government in the Supreme Court are yet to clear the AIBE. The Court heard a PIL challenging appointment of 650 lawyers for the Union.

Supreme Court Upholds AIBE Fee: Dismisses Plea Against Rs 3,500 Charged by BCI

The Supreme Court has dismissed a plea challenging the Rs 3,500 fee charged by the Bar Council of India for the All India Bar Examination, holding that the fee is not unconstitutional. The bench said BCI incurs “huge expenses” in conducting the exam.