Remarks on Operation Sindoor: Supreme Court Adjourns Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad’s Passport Release Plea

Today, On 18th November, The Supreme Court adjourned Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad’s plea seeking the release of his passport, which is linked to remarks made on Operation Sindoor. The matter was deferred even though the Court had earlier fixed November 18 for the hearing.

Operation Sindoor Remarks : Supreme Court to Hear Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad’s Plea on November 18

Supreme Court to Hear Ashoka University Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad’s Plea on ‘Operation Sindoor’ Remarks on November 18. FIRs filed by Haryana Police over his social media posts; bench led by Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said the case requires detailed hearing.

NHRC Takes Suo Motu Action in Ashoka University Professor’s Arrest; Supreme Court Grants Interim Bail

The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of India has taken action regarding the arrest of Ashoka University professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad over his social media post about Operation Sindoor. The NHRC requested a report from Haryana’s Director General of Police, while the Supreme Court granted him interim bail but allowed ongoing investigations to continue.

BREAKING | Supreme Court to Ashoka Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad: “Why Chase Cheap Publicity?” Over Operation Sindoor Post

Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad of Ashoka University was arrested on May 18 by Haryana Police for allegedly making objectionable social media posts about Operation Sindoor. The Supreme Court questioned his motivations for posting, labeling his statements as seeking attention. He remains in judicial custody, with a court hearing set for May 27, 2025.

Ashoka University Prof Ali Khan Mahmudabad Sent to Jail Over Facebook Post on Operation Sindoor

A Sonepat court has placed Prof Ali Khan Mahmudabad in judicial custody following his Facebook post about India’s Operation Sindoor, provoking public outrage over perceived free speech violations. Arrested after police custody due to complaints, his case raises critical questions regarding the boundaries of free expression in national security discussions.