The Bombay High Court dismissed a taxi drivers’ association plea seeking restoration of a prayer shed near Mumbai’s domestic airport for Ramzan. The Court held that airport security concerns cannot be compromised and refused to direct authorities to allot space for namaz.
The Delhi High Court held that ex-servicemen who use age relaxation to qualify for recruitment cannot claim unreserved vacancies on merit. It added that candidates taking category concessions cannot simultaneously seek unreserved consideration during shortlisting or selection process.
Today, On 9th June, The Madras High Court considered Celebi Airport Services India’s petition against the cancellation of its contract over security concerns. Justice Abdul Quddhose is presiding over the case challenging the termination of the agreement by authorities.
Celebi has initiated lawsuits in the Bombay High Court following the Indian government’s cancellation of its security clearance and airport contracts, citing national security concerns. This action is part of broader legal challenges after similar issues arose in Delhi, significantly impacting Celebi’s operations in India amidst geopolitical tensions.
The Supreme Court dismissed`(28th sept) a curative petition from the Central government and Airports Authority of India regarding GMR’s operation of Nagpur Airport. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta asserted there were no grounds for curative jurisdiction. The Court’s previous judgment upheld GMR’s rights, and clarification was provided to prevent future legal misunderstandings.
Today(27th August), The Supreme Court sought Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s input on the Centre and AAI’s curative plea challenging its previous verdict favoring GMR Airports for upgrading and operating Nagpur’s Babasaheb Ambedkar International Airport. The plea responds to a May 2022 decision that upheld a Bombay High Court ruling invalidating a contract cancellation.
