The Supreme Court declined to intervene in the closure of schools amid Delhi’s worsening air pollution, calling the crisis a recurring issue. It issued notice to NHAI and sought concrete long-term measures to curb pollution.
The Bombay High Court said that “authorities cannot attribute Mumbai’s air pollution to Ethiopia’s volcanic ash clouds,” stressing that responsible agencies must focus on local causes and adopt concrete measures instead of offering speculative explanations for rising pollution levels.
The Delhi High Court criticised the government for scheduling outdoor sports during peak pollution months, warning that “school students cannot be called for damage to lungs.”
The Court has sought a reply within four weeks and asked the government to reschedule sports events from next year.
Today, On 13rd November, Supreme Court Warns of Severe Delhi Air Pollution, Says “Situation Is Very Very Serious! Even Masks Are Not Enough.” Justice Narasimha Urges Lawyers to Use Virtual Hearings, Cautioning That Toxic Air May Cause Permanent Health Damage.
The Supreme Court of India will hear the worsening Delhi-NCR air pollution case alongside the Taj Trapezium matter, addressing rising smog levels, poor air quality, and pending reports from CAQM and CPCB.
A Public Interest Litigation has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking to declare air pollution a National Public Health Emergency and to direct the government to create a time-bound National Action Plan with statutory backing for urgent implementation across India.
Today, On 17th September, The Supreme Court highlighted that imprisoning some farmers for stubble burning could act as a strong deterrent and send a clear message to others. The remarks came while hearing petitions on Delhi-NCR’s severe October air pollution.
Today, On 6th May, The Supreme Court has directed a strict ban on firecrackers in NCR. It warned that failure to follow the order will lead to contempt action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 by the authorities.
The Supreme Court of India upheld the ban on firecrackers in Delhi-NCR due to persistent high air pollution levels. Emphasizing the right to health under Article 21 of the Constitution, the court stated that alternatives like “green crackers” must prove minimal pollution before reconsideration. It recognized the severe pollution crisis as an extraordinary situation warranting the ban.
Justice Vikram Nath emphasized the urgent need for stricter pollution regulations and investments in clean technologies during the National Conference on Environment 2025. He articulated concerns over high pollution levels affecting children’s health in New Delhi, called for collective action, and underlined the judiciary’s role in promoting environmental rights and sustainable development.
