A Mumbai Supreme Court advocate and family were attacked in Ujjain after refusing to buy Prasad at a temple kiosk. The advocate suffered head injuries, and a case has been filed against the assailant, with ongoing investigations. The district collector ordered the demolition of illegal shops near the temple, and the accused has been arrested.
The Patna High Court condemned the assault on junior advocates, highlighting safety and justice issues in the city. The police’s inadequate response led to court intervention, including the removal of an officer and the formation of a Special Investigating Team. This case underscores the need for systemic changes to ensure safety and justice for all in Patna.
The Bar Council of India (BCI) announced a pivotal initiative on Wednesday (21 Feb) to help legal practitioners adapt to new criminal codes. This includes a time-bound plan to implement new laws, replacing outdated ones from the 19th century. The BCI aims to support practitioners with comprehensive training and upskilling programs for a smooth transition.
Eminent jurist and Senior Advocate Fali Nariman’s passing was mourned by Law Chakra and Team, with condolences from the legal fraternity. Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud remembered Nariman as a compassionate mentor, while Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal also paid tribute to his towering intellect and exceptional nature.
The Kerala High Court Advocates Association (KHCAA) expressed discontent with Justice A. Badharudeen’s treatment of lawyers, citing refusal to adjourn a case for a health concern and last-minute scheduling. They recommended universal video recording of court proceedings for transparency and fairness. The incident underscores the need for judicial reforms to enhance procedural fairness and transparency.
The Bombay High Court ruled on a high-profile defamation case involving Javed Akhtar and Kangana Ranaut, denying Ranaut’s request to stay the proceedings. The decision underscores the importance of timing in legal battles and the court’s commitment to procedural integrity. This complex case reflects the challenges of addressing defamation in the context of public figures and media scrutiny.
The Kerala High Court Advocate’s Association, alongside its President and Secretary, has filed a plea highlighting instances of police harassment, assault, and false charges against lawyers. The High Court has called for the state’s response and the establishment of clear guidelines to safeguard legal professionals. This pivotal move aims to address the ongoing issue and reinforce respect for the rule of law.
The Supreme Court of India quashed a defamation case against a lawyer brought by a newspaper owner, citing freedom of speech rights. The ruling emphasized the delicate balance between reputation and free speech, affirming the media’s right to freedom of expression and the judiciary’s role in protecting it. This case sets a significant precedent in Indian defamation law.
The former senior Government Pleader from Kerala, Adv P G Manu, was denied anticipatory bail by the Supreme Court after being accused of raping a woman seeking legal advice. The survivor alleges multiple instances of assault and distribution of private pictures. This case highlights the need for accountability in positions of authority and justice for survivors.
Chief Justice Chandrachud emphasizes courtroom etiquette and professionalism in the Supreme Court, reprimanding lawyers for breaches of conduct. His commitment to upholding dignity and decorum serves as a reminder of the importance of etiquette and adherence to courtroom protocols, maintaining the sanctity of legal proceedings. Despite pushback, his stance remains unwavering.