Tahawwur Rana, accused in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, has asked a Delhi court for permission to speak with his family. The NIA has been directed to file its reply by April 23.
Today, On 16th April, In the RSS leader Srinivasan murder case, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the NIA’s plea against bail granted to PFI members. The Court said the special court would be the more appropriate forum to seek bail cancellation.
In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court has tightened the scope of anticipatory bail for absconding individuals, particularly in serious economic offences.
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that an adequately explained delay in recording witness statements does not automatically benefit the accused in a criminal trial.
The Supreme Court granted interim bail to a man accused in a fatal accident after his father pledged Rs 1 crore to support the orphaned children. The Court ensured that the compensation would be for the children’s welfare, regardless of the case’s outcome.
The Supreme Court Today (Feb 28) criticized the Chhattisgarh Police for misusing UAPA to nullify its previous order protecting an accused from arrest. The Court granted him bail and warned of contempt action.
On January 21, 2025, the Supreme Court of India discussed the implications of barring individuals charged with serious crimes from elections. Advocate Ashwini Upadhyay underscored the need for clean candidates, while Justices questioned the availability of such individuals. A prior 2020 judgment mandated political parties to disclose candidates’ criminal histories. The court will hear further arguments on January 27.
In the tragic Worli hit-and-run case, Pradeep Nakhawa has petitioned the Bombay High Court to add a murder charge under Section 103 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita against Mihir Shah, son of Shiv Sena leader Rajesh Shah, and his driver. The incident, involving a BMW dragging his wife Kaveri to her death, has sparked outrage over alleged investigative bias and the accused’s reckless actions.
Mere harassment is not sufficient to hold someone guilty of the offence of abetting suicide, and there must be clear evidence of direct or indirect incitement, the Supreme Court has said. The observations came from a bench of justices Vikram Nath and P B Varale which delivered its verdict on an appeal challenging a Gujarat High Court order which refused to discharge a woman’s husband and her two in-laws for allegedly harassing her and driving her to suicide. The case, registered in 2021, involved accusations under sections 498A (cruelty to a married woman) and 306 (abetment of suicide) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Section 306 carries a penalty of up to ten years of imprisonment and a fine.
While refusing to grant bail to an accused in a drugs case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the Supreme Court Today (Dec 6) made references to popular TV shows Breaking Bad and Narcos. “You cannot fight with these people who are literally killing youth of this country,” Justice Sharma remarked. The Bench evoked two popular shows which deal with the drug trade.
