The Allahabad High Court prohibited bar associations from charging Rs 500 for photo identification, deeming it illegal and a hindrance to justice access. The Court emphasized that unnecessary fees and procedures must be eliminated. It ordered that affidavits sworn before a notary be accepted without defects, promoting a smoother legal process.
CJI BR Gavai defended the strict criteria for impeaching Indian judges, stating such safeguards are essential. He emphasised that they are necessary to protect the judiciary’s independence and prevent misuse of the removal process.
CJI Gavai stressed the transformative role of technology in improving access to justice, saying, “Technology must support, not supplant judicial judgment,” and emphasised that it should assist, not replace, individual case analysis and reasoning.
Online lawyer consultations in India are transforming legal access by making services more affordable, convenient, and transparent. Increased digital literacy and smartphone penetration enable individuals from various backgrounds to seek legal help remotely. While challenges exist, such as the digital divide and data security, the future signifies a more inclusive justice system through continued innovation and government support.
Justice B.R. Gavai announced that the Supreme Court of India will operate with three Vacation Benches weekly during the summer recess, countering the traditional notion of vacations. This change aims to ensure continuous access to justice, demonstrating the Court’s commitment to reducing case pendency and facilitating faster resolutions even during breaks.
Nikhil Kamath argues that India’s justice system favors the privileged due to unequal access to legal resources, with only 1% utilizing free legal aid. He believes AI can democratize justice by enhancing speed, reducing errors, and improving access to legal knowledge, thereby enabling entrepreneurs to create equitable legal solutions for all.
Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, newly appointed Chief Justice of India, emphasized inclusivity and fairness in the legal system during his first public event. He advocated for accessible justice and engagement with marginalized communities. A national film competition for law students was launched to promote legal awareness, showcasing over 100 entries nationwide.
“Where will justice come from?” a former Supreme Court judge asked while speaking on the issue of judicial vacancies. He pointed out that the 1987 Law Commission had recommended 50 judges per million people, which would have meant 40,000 judges based on the population at that time.
Law is not just about justice; it’s a tool for transformation, says ex-CJI DY Chandrachud. He emphasized that laws evolve with time, and overruling past judgments isn’t merely about fixing errors. Instead, it ensures that the law stays relevant to the society it serves. Legal changes reflect societal progress and adaptability.
The lack of Dalit representation in the higher judiciary is a matter of concern for diversity in the system. At the same time, there is gratitude towards the Supreme Court Collegium for focusing on merit instead of caste when making appointments. This highlights the importance of ability while also addressing the need for fairness. Balancing representation and merit remains a key challenge for the judiciary.
