The Supreme Court will hear NHAI’s review plea challenging the retrospective application of its 2019 land compensation verdict that could cost Rs 32,000 crore. The Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan has listed the case for open court hearing on November 11, 2025.
Tempers flared in the Delhi High Court as senior lawyers Mahesh Jethmalani and Rajiv Nayar clashed during arguments in the Sunjay Kapur estate case. Karisma Kapoor’s children seek a share in their late father’s Rs 30,000 crore assets, while widow Priya Kapur claims his entire estate through a will.
Larsen & Toubro (L&T) filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India alleging irregularities in a Rs 14,000 crore tender process by MMRDA for major road projects. L&T claims it hasn’t received updates on its bid’s evaluation. The court expressed concern over the handling of public funds and demanded clarity from MMRDA.
The Madras High Court urged Tamil Nadu to collaborate with the Enforcement Directorate (ED) regarding alleged financial irregularities involving TASMAC. The Advocate General opposed cooperation, criticizing the ED’s unannounced raids. The Court emphasized the need to avoid personal pride while questioning the ED’s motives, especially ahead of upcoming Tamil Nadu elections.
On November 7, the Supreme Court will rule on the five-year Jet Airways ownership dispute between Jalan Kalrock Consortium and creditors led by SBI. JKC claims ownership while creditors request liquidation. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud will deliver the decision before his retirement on November 10, indicating potential impacts on India’s aviation sector.
A case has been filed against BJP MLA Basanagouda Patil Yatnal for insulting Rahul Gandhi during a public meeting. The Supreme Court issued a notice regarding a petition to challenge Yatnal’s election. He also faces accusations of spreading misinformation aimed at destabilizing the Congress government in Karnataka, raising concerns among officials.
The Supreme Court today granted bail to former Bhushan Steel MD Neeraj Singal in a Rs 46,000 crore money laundering case. Justices Khanna and Kumar acknowledged the gravity of the allegations but cited his prolonged custody and stalled trial for bail. Singhvi and Sibal represented Singal. Singal was granted bail with conditions, including surrendering his passport.
The Supreme Court instructed Sahara Group to disclose its leadership, shareholders, and unencumbered properties for a Rs 10,000 crore refund. The court emphasized the need for a practical solution to refund investors after over a decade. Noting Sahara’s failure to deposit the full amount, the court allowed property sales to meet the refund obligation.
The Supreme Court has highlighted Sahara Group’s failure to comply with its order to deposit Rs 10,000 crore into the SEBI-Sahara refund account. The court has emphasized the need for transparency and has instructed the conglomerate to propose a scheme for selling unencumbered properties. Sebi has expressed concerns about the uncertainty regarding the timeline for the group’s payment of the outstanding amount.
The Mumbai police opposed the Enforcement Directorate’s intervention plea in the Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank scam closure report, asserting no unfair losses to the bank. The ED, investigating money laundering linked to the scam, argued that the closure report would impact their case. The alleged scam involved thousands of crores and prominent figures.
