The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, has given legal approval for the appointment of Deputy Chief Ministers, affirming their strategic role in managing internal party dynamics and coalition power.
New Delhi: On Monday, the Supreme Court of India clarified the constitutional validity of appointing Deputy Chief Ministers in states, a common practice aimed at recognizing the seniority and contributions of key leaders within the ruling party or coalition. The bench, led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, alongside Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, addressed the issue by affirming that the role of Deputy Chief Ministers does not contravene any constitutional provision.
ALSO READ: Supreme Court Intervention Sought in High-Profile Sippy Sidhu Murder Case
The court’s decision came in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that questioned the legality of such appointments, arguing that the Constitution of India does not explicitly mention or make provisions for the post of Deputy Chief Ministers. Critics of the practice have often raised concerns about its constitutional validity, suggesting that it might represent an unnecessary expansion of state executive structures without clear constitutional backing.
However, the Supreme Court’s judgment emphatically dismissed these concerns. The bench stated, “Deputy ministers are under Constitution just members of the council of ministers headed by the CM and nothing more.”
This clarification underscores the court’s view that Deputy Chief Ministers, despite the title, are fundamentally members of the council of ministers, with their role and authority deriving from the same constitutional provisions that govern the appointment of other ministers.
ALSO READ: Supreme Court Hold Back Madras High Court’s Land Lease Acquisition Proceedings
The strategic deployment of Deputy Chief Minister by political parties has proven instrumental in navigating internal dynamics, acknowledging the influence of senior leaders, and maintaining a delicate balance of power within diverse coalitions. The Supreme Court’s recognition of the constitutionality of such appointments provides legal endorsement to a practice that has long been an integral part of the political landscape across various states.
Moreover, the court’s decision reinforces the flexibility inherent in the Indian constitutional framework, allowing for the evolution of political practices that accommodate the complex realities of governance in a diverse and populous nation. It highlights the judiciary’s role in interpreting the Constitution in a manner that supports the practical needs of governance while ensuring adherence to the fundamental principles of democracy and federalism.
ALSO READ: Supreme Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to IAF Officer in Matrimonial Site Rape Case
The Supreme Court’s affirmation of the constitutional validity of appointing Deputy Chief Ministers serves as a crucial clarification on the nature and limits of executive power.
