Today, 29th April, The Supreme Court revoked the bail granted by the High Court to a high-profile Karnataka Seer in a POCSO case, mandating his surrender. The case involves serious allegations under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. This decision reflects the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring fair trial proceedings and addressing sensitive matters promptly. The case has attracted considerable public interest due to the prominence of the accused individual.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court, on Monday, reversed a decision by the Karnataka High Court that allowed Seer Shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru to be released on bail. Shivamurthy, who faces allegations of sexually assaulting minor girls, initially granted bail on November 8, 2023. However, upon reviewing a petition from the father of one of the minor victims, the Supreme Court directed the revocation of Shivamurthy’s bail and ordered his arrest within one week.
The Court highlighted concerns that Shivamurthy, being a powerful and influential figure, could potentially interfere with the trial process by influencing witnesses and victims. To ensure a fair trial for both the accused and the victims, the Supreme Court found it necessary for Shivamurthy to remain in custody while the witnesses get examined.
Read Also:Karnataka High Court Refuses to Dismiss Rape Charges Against Seer Shivamurthy Sharanaru
During the proceedings, the Supreme Court bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Prashant Kumar Mishra, emphasized their decision to focus solely on the bail issue to avoid prejudicing the trial’s outcome.
They stated,
“It is prima facie viewed that to ensure a fair trial not only to the accused but also to the victims, it would be in the interest of justice that Shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru remains in custody during the time the witnesses of fact are examined.”
The Supreme Court also issued directives for the trial to be expedited. The Trial Court instructed to reframe the charges against Shivamurthy and to proceed with the trial as swiftly as possible, ideally on a day-to-day basis. This to ensure that all factual witnesses are examined within four months.
The Court expressed,
“We shall refrain from delving into the merits of the case as it could potentially impact the trial proceedings.”
Additionally, the Supreme Court extended a caution regarding the conduct of the parties involved in the trial, noting that any attempts to unnecessarily delay the proceedings should be documented and reported to the higher court.
In summary, the Supreme Court‘s stringent measures reflect its commitment to ensuring a thorough and uninterrupted trial, highlighting the importance of judicial integrity in cases involving influential public figures.
Read Also:[POCSO ACT] Supreme Court Rejected Bail of Lingayat Chief Chitradurga Muruga Mutt Sheer
The implications of the Supreme Court‘s decision are profound, reaffirming the judiciary’s role in maintaining the integrity of the legal process, particularly in cases involving powerful individuals. The directive for Shivamurthy to surrender adds a layer of accountability, emphasizing that no individual stands above the law, regardless of their social or political stature. This case continues to attract significant public and media attention, highlighting ongoing issues related to justice and the protection of vulnerable groups in India.
As the case continues to unfold, it remains a focal point of discussion and analysis, reflecting the broader challenges of addressing sexual abuse allegations, particularly when they involve minors and influential figures. The legal community and the public await further developments, as the court’s decisions will likely have significant implications for legal precedent and societal norms.