The Supreme Court of India is currently engaged in a comprehensive reassessment of its 2018 judgment regarding the automatic expiry of stay orders in civil and criminal cases. This pivotal decision, originally made in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, mandated that interim stay orders by High Courts and other courts would automatically lapse after six months unless explicitly extended. This ruling has been the subject of intense legal debate, prompting its current review by a five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud comprised Justices A S Oka, J B Pardiwala, Pankaj Mithal, and Manoj Misra.
In-depth Discussion and Perspectives
- Adverse Impact on Litigants: Chief Justice Chandrachud expressed concerns about the automatic vacation of stay orders, stating,
“The automatic vacation of stay prejudices the litigant irrespective of the conduct of that litigant. Because there are circumstances over which a litigant has no control.”
This highlights the potential for unfair prejudice against litigants due to systemic issues beyond their control.
- Nature of Vacating Stay Orders: Emphasizing the judicial nature of vacating stay orders, the Chief Justice remarked,
“The vacation of an order of stay is also a judicial act. It is not an administrative act. So by directing that the stay will stand vacated without application of mind a judicial order is enforced as a result of which the stay is effected without application of mind.”
- Concerns About High Court’s Autonomy: Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the Allahabad High Court Bar Association, argued against the automatic vacation of stay orders. He contended that such a mechanism could interfere with the constitutional structure, particularly Article 226, and may be seen as judicial legislation. Dwivedi stated,
“It actually is indicating distrust in the High Court judges,”
questioning the very purpose of having High Courts.
- Systemic Delays in Judiciary: The discussion acknowledged that delays in legal proceedings are often systemic. Dwivedi pointed out that delays were not solely the result of individual actions but could also be attributed to systemic faults within the judicial process, including overburdened judges and extensive caseloads.
- Risk of Miscarriage of Justice: The Supreme Court expressed concerns that the automatic vacation of stay orders could lead to miscarriages of justice. The Chief Justice noted,
“There are two problems. One, the automatic vacation of stay prejudices the litigant irrespective of the conduct of that litigant… Second, the vacation of an order of stay is also a judicial act.”
- Solicitor General’s Insights: Solicitor General Tushar Mehta highlighted the issues arising from the 2018 ruling, stating that it “takes away the discretion of the High Court.” He also referred to instances where contempt cases were filed against judges for not resuming trials after the stay had expired as per the 2018 judgment.
Also read- Lok Sabha Approves 33% Women’s Reservation In J&K, Puducherry Assemblies (lawchakra.in)
The Supreme Court’s ongoing deliberation on this critical issue underscores the need for a nuanced approach to the automatic expiry of stay orders. The bench is carefully considering various perspectives, including the importance of judicial discretion in extending stay orders and the need to preserve the autonomy and trust in High Courts. This reassessment is a vital step in addressing the complexities and challenges posed by the automatic expiry of stay orders in the Indian judicial system.
The final judgment, which is currently reserved by the Supreme Court, is highly anticipated by the legal community. Its outcome could significantly influence the conduct of civil and criminal trials in India, balancing the need for timely justice with the rights and interests of litigants. The decision is expected to set a precedent in ensuring that judicial processes are fair, equitable, and considerate of the various factors influencing legal proceedings in the country.
Also read-India’s Central Government Introduces Revised Criminal Law Bills In Lok Sabha (lawchakra.in)
