The case came to the Supreme Court’s attention following an appeal by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against the Bombay High Court’s June 2023 order
A landmark ruling on Friday has caught the attention of legal circles across India, the Supreme Court expressed its disapproval of the Bombay High Court’s decision to grant bail to an individual accused of money laundering, despite having previously reserved judgment on a petition to quash the case against him. This development underscores the judiciary’s ongoing struggle to balance the rights of the accused with the imperatives of justice and legal propriety.
Unprecedented Judicial Move Sparks Controversy
On Friday, marked by judicial scrutiny, the Supreme Court, led by Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, voiced its concerns over the Bombay High Court’s unconventional decision to grant interim bail to a money laundering suspect. This decision came after the High Court had “de-reserved” the quashing plea, choosing to revisit the matter in a less formal setting, away from the public eye.
The Supreme Court’s bench highlighted a significant procedural anomaly, pointing out that the accused had not sought bail in his initial plea.
“Propriety required the roster bench not to pass such an order. What is shocking is, when releasing the case, when admittedly there was no prayer for release on bail, the court granted bail for releasing the first respondent (accused). Matter is remitted to concerned bench to be heard on out-of-turn priority if bail is pressed. Order granting bail has not been set aside on merits, it is clarified,”
the Supreme Court stated, emphasizing the departure from standard legal practices.
Legal and Ethical Questions Raised
This incident raises questions about the ethical and procedural standards governing judicial conduct in India. By granting bail in the absence of a formal request, the Bombay High Court has sparked a debate on the boundaries of judicial discretion and the importance of adhering to established legal frameworks.
The Supreme Court’s directive to remit the matter back to the concerned bench for out-of-turn priority hearing, should bail be pressed, underscores the apex court’s intent to ensure that due process is followed.
“Order granting bail has not been set aside on merits, it is clarified,”
the Supreme Court added, leaving room for a reassessment of the bail decision based on its merits.
The Enforcement Directorate’s Challenge and Legal Representation
The case came to the Supreme Court’s attention following an appeal by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against the Bombay High Court’s June 2023 order. The accused, Bablu Sonkar, had initially sought to quash the money laundering charges against him, leading to a complex legal battle that culminated in the controversial bail decision.
Representing the opposing sides in this legal confrontation were Senior Advocate Siddhartha Dave, arguing on behalf of Sonkar, and Additional Solicitor General SV Raju, presenting the ED’s case. The Supreme Court’s intervention, soliciting responses from both the Maharashtra government and the accused, reflects the case’s significance in the broader context of India’s legal and financial enforcement landscape.
Implications for Judicial Conduct and Legal Precedence
This case not only highlights the challenges inherent in balancing judicial discretion with legal propriety but also sets a precedent for how similar cases might be handled in the future. The Supreme Court’s decision to send the case back for a fresh consideration of the bail plea and the criminal appeal on their merits signals a commitment to ensuring that justice is served in accordance with the law, without undue influence or procedural irregularities.
As the legal community and the public at large await the Bombay High Court’s next steps, this case serves as a reminder of the complexities and responsibilities that come with judicial authority. The outcome of the reconsideration could have far-reaching implications for how bail decisions are approached in cases involving serious charges such as money laundering, potentially influencing future judicial decisions and legal reforms in India.
Also Read- TN Rejects Statutory Bail Plea Of ED Officer Ankit Tiwari In Bribery Case (lawchakra.in)
