Today, On 1st May, as explained by the Supreme Court, a complete chargesheet, should be comprehensive, detailing the allegations against the accused with clarity and specificity. It must include all relevant evidence, witness statements, and legal provisions invoked.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court, On Wednesday, emphasized that the evidence presented in a chargesheet by the investigating agency must meet a certain standard. Specifically, this evidence should be of a nature and quality that, if proven, would sufficiently establish the alleged offense.
The court’s ruling highlights the importance of robust and credible evidence in legal proceedings, highlighting that the strength of the evidence provided in a chargesheet plays a pivotal role in determining the validity of the charges brought against an individual or entity.
The Bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and SVN Bhatti elaborated that a well-prepared chargesheet should be comprehensive enough to allow for a fair trial without unfairly favouring either the accused or the prosecution. This implies that the chargesheet should contain all necessary information and evidence required for the trial to proceed smoothly and without bias. In essence, the completeness of the chargesheet is crucial to ensure that both the accused and the prosecution have a fair and equal opportunity to present their respective cases during the trial process.
Read Also: Supreme Court to Frame Guidelines on Governors’ Bill Referral Powers
The Court stated,
“The adequacy and probative value of evidence presented in a chargesheet should, prima facie, establish the commission of an offense, provided that the presented material and evidence are proven. A chargesheet is deemed comprehensive when it does not solely depend on supplementary evidence. The trial can then proceed based on the evidence and material already submitted with the chargesheet. This standard is not unduly technical or infallible but strikes a pragmatic balance to protect the innocent from unjustified delays and prolonged incarceration, while also preserving the prosecution’s right to introduce additional evidence supporting the charges.”
The Bench emphasized the importance of clarity and completeness in a chargesheet, noting that it should contain detailed and unambiguous entries in all sections. This ensures that courts can easily comprehend the specific crimes committed and identify the accused individuals associated with each offense.
Essentially, a well-structured chargesheet not only facilitates understanding for the judiciary but also streamlines the legal process by providing a clear roadmap of the alleged criminal activities and the parties involved.
The Court elaborated,
“Statements pursuant to Section 161 of the Code and associated documents must be included along with the witness list. The chargesheet should distinctly outline the role attributed to each accused in the crime,”
The statements made in the context of resolving appeals arising from disputes over a contested property in Delhi involving multiple parties. The criminal complaints, lodged in Uttar Pradesh, alleged offenses such as cheating, breach of trust, and criminal conspiracy. Initially, the Allahabad High Court declined to quash the first information reports (FIRs) and magistrate summons related to the case.
However, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favour of the appeals filed by the deceased man’s sons, who involved in the property dispute. As a result, the other accused individuals given the opportunity to seek pre-arrest bail, and the summons order against them sent back to the Magistrate for reconsideration.
This decision signifies the Court’s efforts to ensure fairness and due process in legal proceedings, particularly in cases involving complex property disputes and criminal allegations.
Read Judgement: [Sharif Ahmed and anr v. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr]