The State Bank of India (SBI) has approached the Supreme Court with a plea to extend the deadline for disclosing details of electoral bonds to the Election Commission. The national banking giant has requested an extension until June 30, citing the need for additional time to compile the comprehensive data required by the Election Commission.
Also read- “Bribery Is Complete When Bribery Is Accepted”: CJI (lawchakra.in)
Electoral bonds have been a subject of intense debate since their introduction, hailed by some as a step towards ensuring cleaner funding of political activities, while criticized by others for lacking transparency and enabling anonymous contributions. The SBI, being the sole authorized bank to issue these bonds, finds itself at the center of this controversy, tasked with balancing regulatory compliance and operational capabilities.
The Supreme Court has brought an end to the contentious electoral bonds scheme, citing its infringement on citizens’ right to information. Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud declared the scheme unconstitutional and arbitrary, expressing concerns about its potential to foster quid pro quo arrangements between political parties and donors.
The bank’s legal counsel, in a statement to the court, emphasized the logistical challenges and the volume of data involved.
“Given the intricate nature of the data and the need to ensure its accuracy, we respectfully request an extension of the deadline,”
the counsel stated, highlighting the bank’s commitment to transparency while also ensuring the confidentiality mandated by the scheme’s guidelines.
Also read- Spanish Tourist Gang Rape: 3 Convicted, Manhunt Underway For 4 More Suspects (lawchakra.in)
The Election Commission, tasked with overseeing fair electoral practices, has been adamant about the need for transparency in political funding, viewing the details of electoral bond transactions as crucial for maintaining the integrity of elections. The commission’s stance has been supported by various civil society groups, who argue that transparency in political funding is fundamental to a healthy democracy.
The Supreme Court’s decision on this matter is eagerly awaited, with implications for electoral transparency, political funding, and the regulatory framework governing electoral bonds. Legal experts suggest that the court’s ruling could set a precedent for future cases related to electoral finance and transparency.
As the debate over electoral bonds continues, all eyes are on the Supreme Court, which is expected to balance the competing interests of transparency, privacy, and practicality in its ruling. The outcome of this case could mark a significant moment in the ongoing discourse on political funding in India.
