The Supreme Court will hear a plea challenging Banu Mushtaq’s invitation as Mysuru Dasara Chief Guest, emphasizing that participation across faiths does not violate constitutional rights in India.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India has agreed to urgently list a petition challenging the Karnataka High Court’s refusal to intervene in the State government’s decision to invite Booker Prize-winning author Banu Mushtaq as the Chief Guest for the upcoming Mysuru Dasara festivities. The matter was mentioned before Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai, who allowed it to be heard on Friday, September 20, given that the event is scheduled for September 22.
ALSO READ: Transgender Reservation in PG Medical Seats | Supreme Court to Hear Plea Next Week
High Court’s Refusal to Interfere
On September 15, a Division Bench of Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice CM Joshi of the Karnataka High Court dismissed a series of petitions opposing Mushtaq’s participation. The petitioners alleged that her previous “anti-Hindu” statements disqualified her from presiding over a festival with deep cultural and religious significance.
The High Court, however, firmly rejected the contention. It noted that Mushtaq is an accomplished author, lawyer, and social activist, having held various public offices, including roles in municipal governance, healthcare, and women’s development forums. The Bench emphasized that the choice of guests does not infringe upon the rights guaranteed under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which safeguard religious freedoms.
Court’s Observations
The High Court emphasized that the Dasara festivities are organized by the State every year and historically have been inaugurated by individuals from diverse backgrounds, including scientists, educationists, authors, and freedom fighters.
The Court observed:
“Participation of a person practicing a particular faith or religion, in celebrations of festivals of other religion does not offend the rights available under Constitution of India.”
It concluded that inviting Mushtaq does not violate any constitutional value or principle.
